Confusion in (progress) after the victories of the army
It seems that military victories won by the Sudanese army recently in various axes of the rapid support militia caused great confusion in the middle of the Coordination of Civil Democratic Forces (Progress), which is accused by the Allied Wing to Forces Armies, because it is the political incubator of the militia.
– This confusion began to Claire after two contradictory declarations, issued by civil servants in coordination between refusal and confirmation.
For his part, he published the Jack's Bakri
A spokesperson for coordination is a declaration which said that (the political mechanism of “progress” at his last meeting agreed to disengage between entities and the individuals who insist on the formation of the government, and between Entities and individuals adhering to not training any government individually or with one of the parties to the fighting and he added: (a committee was formed to reach the disengagement formula in a way that exalted both parties agreed, so that each of them works in an independent and organizational independently and organizational way of the other). He stressed that (coordination is not biased with a part of the war and does not recognize the legitimacy of the de facto authority at the Sudan port or any other authority).
For his part, Al -hadi Idris denied
The vice-president of coordination, Magia, in the official spokesperson, indicating that he (he does not express the official position of the coordination, and the declaration has not been agreed by any of the approved coordination organizations, and It has not been agreed with the well within the well – known organizational executives). He added: (we confirm that the coordination no decision has yet been made on the question of the formation of a government, and that This question is still under discussion between all parties).
-Idris stressed that (that is to say the hasty declarations published outside the organizational context are irresponsible attempts to impose certain programs and do not represent the collective will of the Alliance, and the urgent declaration of Word of coordination in an attempt to create a division within “progress”, which we strongly reject).
– He concluded by saying: (we reject any attempt to impose a fait accompli without referring to all partners in “progress”, and we direct all official “coordination” agencies to join the mechanism line policy).
Follow us
