Khartoum finds its delivery and will do it? – The face of the truth – ✍️ Ibrahim Shaqlawi
The Khartoum Liberation Battle of the rapid support militia is a turning point articulated on the Sudanese scene, not only from the point of view of the restoration of the capital’s control, but also from the point of view of the reformulation of military and political sales in the country. Since the start of the war in April 2023, Khartoum has become a court of confrontation between the Sudanese army and the rapid support militia, which sought to kidnap the state, taking advantage of external support and internal coverage of certain parts. In this article, we try to review the evidence and the indications of the release of Khartoum, which can be completed before the arrival of the article, considering that the army does not reveal their plans, but what is available from information that remains little.
The current scene of Khartoum returns to the mind of an articulated historic moment that the capital witnessed on January 26, 1885, when the supporters of the Mahdist Revolution, led by Prince Wad al-Nujoumi, took over the City and abandoned the Turkish-Egyptian reign, declaring the start of a new stage in the history of Sudan. Today, after more than a century, Sudan attended another battle to release Khartoum, this time the grip of the rapid support militia, in a battle bearing political, military and security dimensions similar to the context national and the expected results of the country future. Where the army fights an existential battle against a force which tried to change the path of the State by force and to impose a regional project to dismantle the country.
The Sudanese army, supported by other regular forces and Al -Mestafrin, managed to impose a tight military cord on the capital, in a plan launched by the army commander, Lieutenant -General Abdel -Fattah Al – Burhan, president of the sovereign council, such as “Merk Zerddo”, following the progressive gulling strategy and a progressive depletion which led to the reduction of the influence of the militia in Khartoum. The supply of Al-Jazeera, recently found by the army, began to reach the surroundings of the capital through the southern and eastern axes, taking from the east of the Nile a major starting point in the operations of release.
Recent developments have revealed a clear retirement on the rapid support militia, as significant withdrawals have recorded its elements, in particular foreign mercenaries that have started to leave the combat sites. The field reports also indicate internal divisions and cracks in their organizational structure, which has reflected on its military performance and its combat efficiency, which facilitated the hacking and control of the armed forces.
The restoration by the army of Khartoum Bahri formed a major turning point during military operations, because of its strategic location, because the northern door of the capital is considered to be a biological infrastructure, in particular the refinery of jelly, which was under Militia control for months. In addition, maritime insurance means limiting the capacity of the rebellion to carry out supply or re-positioning operations, which increased its isolation inside the pipe and pushing it towards a complete collapse.
After a naval restoration, the armed forces are close to the entourage of the militia inside the remaining districts of the center and southern Khartoum, where the spraying of Soba, Mak Nimr and Mansheya are decisive engagement points in The battle. In light of this cordiality, the completion of the release of the capital becomes a special moment with the movements of the army in the eastern districts of Khartoum, including Riyadh and the extension of Nasser and the Globe, which improves Pressure on the militia.
The battle to free Khartoum cannot be seen in isolation of regional and international repercussions, because the collapse of the rapid support militia will be a blow for the attempts of certain regional powers to reshape the Sudanese scene by supporting the armed factions, the Movements of these days in Abdel Aziz El Helou in southern Kordofan indicates that there are tendencies to preserve the war from the works of the Sudanese army. As they realize that the success of the army in the restoration of Khartoum will return to the card of influence in the region, and this will also improve the opportunities of Sudan in the long term, as well as to prepare the political climate of the national forces .
Consequently, the release of Khartoum does not necessarily mean the end of the Sudanese crisis. External interference face.
History tells us about many capitals released by its national army and the restoration of state sovereignty. When this constituted articulated stages in the history of peoples, such as “Berlin, Kuwait and Kabul”, these experiences show that the liberation of capitals is not only a military event but rather a turning point in the formation of the political scene, economic and security. In Sudan, Sudanese see the release of Khartoum will reissue the balance of internal powers and affect external relations, in particular the light of regional and international competition for influence in the country. Consequently, the management of the country must move forward with the completion of liberation by restaurants, by carrying out peace, by protecting national sovereignty and by providing a national project which brings Sudan together, by allocating tasks social reconciliation for state institutions and society to reach a stable country.
Consequently, the release of Khartoum means that the Nile recovers its well and that the country tells its will, it is not only because it is the capital, but because it is the homeland, whose sons abandoned attempts to impose the foreign project for force of arms. Consequently, this historic moment places Sudan before a major responsibility, which requires establishing security and reaching peace in addition to a transition stage led by the army, as the national institution capable of protecting the ‘Unity of the country and to prevent chaos. Permanent stability is not obtained once the security threats are completed, but rather to establish solid and solid political terrain, which requires the granting of narrow affiliation parties and forces. Consequently, the elections should not be precipitated as long as a real national consensus is not far from zero conflicts to save the country the agitation and chaos scenarios, thus ensuring a democracy based on conscience, which guarantees the stability and security and promotion of national sovereignty. It is the face of truth.
You are fine and well.
