The balance of political discourse after the war – between the lines – ✍️ Dhulnurin Nasruddin, the lawyer
After the war, God wants, who has become imminent, political discourse will be formed according to new balances which reflect the deep transformations of the political and social scene.
The discourse that prevails (children of the generation of dignity) is the discourse of peace and reconciliation which calls for the implementation of the conflict, the reunification of the country and the holding of the people involved in war, remuneration, reconstruction and construction with new foundations, a mission and a rebirth of the values rooted in society
And the discourse of the importance of framing popular resistance and activating its military and civil role by the balance of military forces on the ground, in particular the court security plan through which the pillars of development and reconstruction are launched to preserve internal stability.
Also give the importance of a discourse of political reform based on institutional criteria through popular, rooted and societal depths and, of course, the blocks and the Safavid parties will not have renewed roles on the history of the party without real rules
And they are unable to control the state joints in search of chairs, and of course, certain trumpets will appear for the regulators of the IHOUT or the organizations that identify with the external project of new slogans to reproduce and the democratic transformation, radical, freedom and human rights path through civil society organizations and human rights platforms. … etc., it is intended to contradict these contents, and millions of dollars will be spent by organizations and customer countries, so that national forces must be careful and worry about recycling the crisis because the political scene is not complicated.
The discourse of foreign powers, like the African Union, will highlight the United Nations and certain neighboring countries to influence the nature of internal political discourse
And they will seek to train political alliances and a germination of customers through these facades, and the sidelines and the justice of development will abound these organizations or training training.
Finally, this is due to those who present their principles on the political market to get closer to the court of the court and to show their ability to influence and they are weak in the popular will.
In the end, the balance of political discourse in Sudan will remain dependent on the ability of new powers to train and impose their national vision
