Black smoke and higher problem: burning tire damage exceeds the demonstrations in Sudan – something for the fatherland – ✍️ Mr. Salah is strange
In the midst of votes condemning the repression and violations of human rights in Sudan, columns of thick black smoke increases by the fire of the tires. This act, which is intended to be a cry of visible and influential protest, leads to serious damage which exceeds the current moment and calls for a break to contemplate its feasibility and its expensive costs. While some see it as a means of expressing anger and communicating the voice, reality confirms that it has by far in terms of environmental, health and economic repercussions, which makes us ask us: does this method really serve the supreme question that the demonstrators are looking for?
The climbing of smoke from the combustion of tires is not only a transient cloud, but rather a toxic mixture of microscopic molecules and harmful gas which threaten both human health and the environment. This smoke contains dangerous chemicals such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds, as well as solid carbon particles. The inhalation of these substances leads to the exacerbation of respiratory diseases such as asthma and bronchitis, and increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, and can have negative long -term effects on growth and development, especially in children, elderly and the most vulnerable.
At the environmental level, tire burn is a real disaster. The frames are made of non -biological decomposition materials, and when burned, they are released with huge amounts of pollutants in air, soil and water. The ashes resulting from the fire bear toxic substances which disclose in the soil and pollution of groundwater, which affects the sources of agriculture and drinking water. In addition, thick smoke contributes to air pollution and the formation of smoked fog, which negatively affects the quality of air and vision, and causes damage to ecosystem in general.
Economically, burning tires are delayed on heavy material losses. In addition to street cleaning costs and toxic waste elimination, there are healthy costs resulting from the treatment of diseases associated with air pollution. In addition, the repetition of these actions can disrupt traffic and trade and negatively affects the daily economic activities of citizens.
In the current Sudanese context, where calls from the first team, Abdel Fattah Al -Burhan, to carry weapons to face the rebellion instead of burning tires, the question of the effectiveness of this means of protest becomes more urgent. While demonstrators seek to express their rejection of repression and human rights violations, environmental pollution and harm the health of citizens? Can this act lead to counterproductive results, because the emphasis is sidelined by the essence of human rights demands with negative effects resulting from the protest itself?
The request for freedom, justice and human rights is noble questions that deserve each sacrifice and each effort. However, it is necessary to choose the means which serve these objectives and do not lead to damage more prejudicial to society and the environment. There are many peaceful and civilizational ways to express protests and healthy delivery, which can be more effective and long -term long -term.
The burning tires send a strong message, but it is responsible for a lot of damage to everyone. It is very important that legitimate anger is directed towards more sustainable and harmful forms than protest, which maintains the security and the environment of citizens, and guarantees that the emphasis remains on the fundamental requirements of freedom, justice and peace in Sudan. Black smoke resulting from burning tires can hide behind it a higher problem, but at the same time, it pollutes our present and drains our future.
Follow us
