When international law insults … A critical reading of the Sudanese Communist Party declaration on the Israeli aggression against Iran ✍️ Hisham Mahmoud Suleiman
In the middle of the climbing continues in the Middle East and its strong repercussions on international law and the universal system, the Sudanese Communist Party published a net declaration in which the recent Israeli attack on Iranian soil has condemned. The declaration appeared on its surface. The same thing between his positions on the questions of the outside and his behaviors concerning the questions of the interior
Although the declaration is based on the Charter of the United Nations and the principle of prohibiting the use of power and commitment to the sovereignty of states and warnings of the danger of prejudice to the balances of international legitimacy, we see that this same moral position is hidden when it comes to Sudanese internal affairs. The criteria of neutrality with regard to his opponents within the national scene. The party’s declaration indicated that the attack on Iran is a blatant violation of international law and undermines the principle of not using force and threatens the collective security system and this is true, but at the same time, it went to the eyes of the calls for disobedience without respect for constitutional legitimacy or simply principles
With its intelligent reference to the dangers of chaos and the transgression of sovereign borders, the party ignores the fact that it is part of the state of the political division which disrupted the path of the democratic transition and confused the national scene, which is a violation of the principle
The declaration evoked the condemnation of the duplication of international standards, in particular with regard to the possession of Israel of nuclear weapons without supervision, while strict restrictions are imposed on other countries, but the irony is that the party itself exercises a kind of this duplication in its political speech, so that things call the names abroad and to make a collusion when Cadre of the decisive interior as the fact of the international fall in sullation on the international suction and (false neutrality) he considered it as a form of collusion, and here a legitimate question arises when the Sudanese communist party is violations of human rights in Sudan when a statement does not clearly send it the aggressor? On the contrary, he often provides gray positions or is equivalent to the executioner and the victim as he criticized in his declaration the international position towards the aggression against Iran
What the Communist Party provides in this declaration is not without legal validity in the description of the Israeli aggression, but it loses a lot from its charity when it reads in the light of its contradictory positions and its internal political behavior. The defense of international law is essential and does not benefit from principles in accordance with interests or circumstances and anyone claims to defend justice abroad must be practiced first at home
In conclusion, the Declaration of the Sudanese Communist Party seems to be a warning to the world of the dangers of the exhaust of controls of international legitimacy, but at the same time, an internal question in us more dangerous than those who defend justice in Sudan when the law itself becomes an arena for selection and alignment?
The danger does not reside only in the predominance of the logic of force in the world in the world, but in the condolences of those who call it from its practice in their country of origin
Follow us
