The prestige of the State is not reached by threats, and the literature of the dispute is not said by the promises – whispering of letters – ✍️ d. Al -Baqir Abdul Qayyum Ali
In the critical moments that our bereaved homeland passes, and with the complexities of the political scene and the growing discourse of violence and extension, it has become necessary for us to stand at the crossroads of speech, and not as fans of a team against another, but to be children of this country who have no good, we think that what is said in the public, should not threaten the rest of the state.
Yes, we do not agree with the sovereignty of the team, the first corner of Abdel -Fattah al -burhan, and we criticize it when he makes mistakes, and we agree with her when it is afflicted, so it is the literature of the dispute and the contradiction of the literature, and therefore the states are based on dialogue, not by the threat and the most obedient.
What was recently issued during one of the meetings of the State of the Red Sea is an explicit and public threat to the Head of State and the army commander, who is not one of the faces of opinion, and it is not a political objection, but rather a save contempt for his sovereignty.
Whoever threatens the sovereign council today will threaten any civil servant tomorrow, and whoever awaits violence today, will lead the country until the explosion tomorrow.
The speech that was said, and has been circulated through social media, do not need a lot of legal analysis, as it is a declared crime in broad daylight, and it fals under the risk of that that criminalize incentive and thread, and to offend the symbols of the state Sovereign Institutions, and it is not acceptable that such Statements Pass the honorable passage, as if Nothing Had Happened, so silence about it will be implicit declaration that which raises the voice with weapons to which he listens and which imposes his conditions.
Here, we must stop at the great responsibility of the director Muhammad al -amin Turk, who was silent about him. Silence in a place like this is not neutral, and that explains the complicity, but with silence, especially since it has not been issued by the Supreme Council of Beja, no explanatory declaration or official excuses for what has happened, and that is not suitable for leaders who are supposed to be estimated.
We do not call the suppression of the voices or the mute requests, but we refuse to put these requests above the swords of intimidation, and under the shadow of the threat, just as the political dispute does not give any license to insult the symbol of the State, and reduces its position, because the state is not the property of a person, but it is not insulted either in the name of the people.
What happened is not only a language is a dangerous warning to a future in which political differences can be managed with the logic of weapons, and not the argument, and in the manner of chaos, not of the system, and if the state does not interfere, this preceding will open doors that believe that the security of Pino wants.
Prestige is not restored in silence and is not respected by sweet speeches.
And we say to the Sudanese people who are not intended to contradict, so let them violate the politeness of the dispute and the contradiction of literature, and whoever wants to oppose, that he opposes a spirit, but whoever chooses the path of the threat and the promise, he is not disagreeing with a person, but rather in a dispute with the principle of the state itself.
And God is at the origin of intention, and He guides the same way
