Saddam adults on the banks of the Red Sea: has Sudan become a tribal egg? – The winner of Al -Dai – ✍️ d. Mohamed Tabidi
In the Midst of the Struggle BetWeen Tehran and Tel Aviv, and the Escalation of the Drums of War on the Burning Middle East Theater, the features of Encrypted Political Messages Are Evident in the Horizon that exceed the Borders of Geography, and the Doors of the Red Sea, Specifically The Sudanese Regional Water, Which Have Become Without Exaggeration of A Geopolitical Lung Open to Opposite Options and incompatible Camps.
The shadow war is transmitted to light:
For years, the Iranian-Israeli conflict remained in secret, under the cover of intelligence operations, selective strikes and precise assassinations, but what the region has recently witnessed bombings targeting consulates, and direct threats between the two sides preceding a qualitative change in the “shadow war” in a “direct shock”, and all the fronts have become a candidate flammable.
Port Sudan .. Mirror of international conflict!:
Far from Tehran and Tel Aviv, Port Soudan witnesses unwritten messages of contradictory international powers, which in Sudan sees an open strategic location on all possibilities. The Russian presence offered at the naval base of Flamingo and the growing American activities of the Red Sea, are concerned about the image of the Cold War and in a new form.
Each plane landed at Port Sudan airport, and each meeting closed in a hotel in its hotels, an implicit message: “Sudan is not on the fringes”.
Who do we allow? East or West camp?
At a time when the pressure on the pipe increases to take a decisive position, the fundamental question arises: can Sudan remain neutral in this unleashed conflict?
Does national interest require alignment with the Eastern camp represented in Russia, China and Iran?
Or get involved in Western alliances led by the United States?
The East promises mutual respect and military and technical support without net political conditions, while the West is seduced by financial assistance and development partnerships, but it is conditional to the sensitive political positions which affect national sovereignty.
The decision is not technical, but linked to the existence in the future of the country, and the need to build an independent state, governed by the supreme interest, and not ideological links.
Sudan between hammer and anvil:
In the light of this reality, Sudan remains like the “authentic horse that Ligman is disputed”, which is in front of complex options which are not simplicity:
Silence reads the bias.
And the bias generates hostility.
The budget requires exceptional diplomatic competence, the characteristics of which are not yet clear.
When geography speaks, slogans are silent:
It is not wise to fight a war that we do not have its causes, nor to rest from a world that does not expect frequencies. The new equation in the Red Sea is now formulated, and any Sudanese absence of it is a strategic erosion of influence and interests.
Do we have the will of the independent decision?
Or will we stay a court to liquidate international accounts?
The time alone is enough to answer .. but if we are late to take a rational national position, we can be the question that history poses, not the answer.
I will write to the homeland until my last breath
