Great Britain.. Sidi B. Sidou – Behind the news – ✍️ Muhammad Wadaa

*Britain intervened to change the nature of the Security Council session from a closed session in which Sudan was entitled to participate to a consultation session exclusively for Council members*

*Britain is helping to obscure the truth and selling out Sudan in a situation the Sudanese people will not forget or forgive.*

*Britain is a real partner in the assassination of the Sudanese, as are the Emirates, Chad, Uganda and America*

*What Britain has done, by British standards, is disgraceful, disgraceful and disgusting*.

Sudan's representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Al-Harith Idris, announced in a press release that Britain had intervened to change the nature of the Security Council session requested by Sudan, from one closed session in which Sudan had the right to participate, in a consultation session exclusively reserved for members of the Council. Ambassador Al-Harith Idris added: “Britain gave the excuse of not having obtained a translation of our message”, which demands that the Security Council be invited to discuss the issue of the complaint of Sudan against the United Arab Emirates. that the discussion on this matter will either confirm the differences between the Western group or will not exempt the UAE from condemnation. Therefore, the discussion of the complaint will be postponed to the Presidency of the Council of Mozambique during the month of May. Sudan's complaint appears to have caused a violent shock that the Emirates did not expect, and so they resorted to pressuring the three permanent members to cancel the meeting. Having failed to do so after scheduling it, Britain intervened for a change. the nature of the session, and this in itself is seen as a positive indicator that the complaint was painful and that the Emirates failed to convince its allies of the validity of its position. He went on to say: “Although The Times newspaper reported that the UAE canceled ministerial meetings with Britain because Britain, the spokesperson for Sudanese issues at the United Nations, would not was not enthusiastic about the UAE's request. His intervention to change the nature of the meeting is in itself an abuse of the moral responsibility of the spokesperson. and the failure to respect neutrality regarding issues arising regarding Sudan in the Security Council.

Yesterday we wrote that Sudan does not rely on a decision that does justice to its case, and we demonstrated this by the failure of the Council on dozens of occasions to issue a decision aimed at ending the Israeli war against Gaza and by the use of the veto to prevent condemnation of Israel. Britain intervened to disrupt the session and preempt any possible decision or statement, and decided that it would be a secret session and without the presence of the Sudanese representative. According to what was announced, the session was postponed until the month of. May and under the presidency of Mozambique.

There is no doubt that Britain, by this act, confirmed its moral fall and its helplessness in the face of Emirati blackmail, and confirmed once again that it is a state subordinate to Britain and the America, through their despicable role in the conflict. The Quartet (America, Great Britain, Saudi Arabia and the Emirates) caused the crisis to spread everywhere… The two countries went to war, and they remained powerless in the face of the slogan (the alternative to the framework is the war). is a servile supporter of the Emirates with a handful of financial interests and possibly bribes, which helps to erase the truth and put Sudan in a position that the Sudanese people will not forget or forgive not. committed to killing the Sudanese, as did the Emirates, Chad, Uganda, America and others.

The Sudanese government must be patient and continue its diplomatic campaign with all regional and international organizations, forward the complaint to the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court and improve preparations for the next session. This remains a duty for the Sudanese people. to forcefully express their concerns, during the peaceful protests he expressed his rejection of British behavior and participated in demonstrations denouncing (paid) British collusion with the Emirates,

What Britain has done, by British standards, is disgraceful, disgraceful and disgusting, and reflects the extent of the predicament in which Britain has found itself. This undoubtedly reveals the UAE's panic over a simple complaint to the Security Council, and the Emirates will soon find out. that the sword of blackmail and the purchase of positions with money will exhaust her to the end, and she will only reap harm from her ills that she cannot accept.

April 30, 2024






Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button