The responsibility of the collective scene ✍️ Awad Allah Nawi
– When people sit before the general command and things were resolved in the military establishment, the decision which overthrew the previous regime was not a passing decision or a passing bleeding, but rather a decision of the collective council. The security committee, which was trained at the time – as Ibn Auf said when he declared his reserve at the head of the regime – agreed to manage the scene with the spirit of a team, there is no person of anyone on anyone, nor a decision imposed by the hand of an individual.
– Ibrahim Jaber, Yasser Al -atta, Shams Al -Din Kabashi, Al -Burhan and even Hamidi – before turning around and rebeling – they showed their opinion, arguing, and the decision was taken after a debate and collective deliberations.
– But little by little, the game started to change … Daqis started to whisper in the ear of proof: “You are the president … You are the leader … Make your decisions.” The famous decisions of October 25 were, but – despite the image that was drawn around – was not a pure individual coup, but rather a decision in which all the soldiers participated in the sovereign council, and they accepted it, or at least they did not oppose it publicly.
– Tyrannia does not start from an individual decision, but from a group that adorns the sovereign of his actions, mixing colors in front of him, changing the spectator in his favor and makes him think that his voice is the absolute truth. Here is the danger; Collective judgment, when it turns into songs that glorify the individual, is balance and the state is transformed into the theater with which passions manipulate.
* The group rule … and the group’s opinion *
– The collective decision does not mean that opinions are buried or frozen, but rather that the decision is pure for discussion and joint agreement. Any fateful decision – of the evolution of governments, to the signing of agreements, to the declaration of war or peace – must cross all parties. It is the essence of collective responsibility that protects the state from the shift from individualism.
* The transition period … from Abd al -tarib to those who followed it *
-The transition period was not only a closed military administration, but rather a partnership with the political forces, some of which were Abdul -Waybah in Abdel -Fattah al -burhan, while he was walking in his various directions; The political incubator, the civil parties and the activists, all were part of the scene, either by their consent, their imprint, or even the complicity of some of them.
* Conclusion … Bunyan will not disintegrate *
The proof alone will not be able to change the scene and will not be able to withdraw any member of the sovereign council of the army; Jabbashi remains in his position, Yasser Al -atta is solid equipment on the ground, Ibrahim Jaber is an impenetrable repentance, and the proof – whatever his voice – is one in front of the three. This scene is completed with the director of the intelligence service, who crossed the era river “Al -qaht”, and they demanded that they promote him from the deputy director to the director of what was known for his professionalism and his efficiency.
– This stacked structure will not disintegrate, Il Wills, who Wills and my father’s father, and will remain firm until the end of the transition period … and whoever dreams of dismantling him now, that he wakes up before the dream swallows it.
