Quartet .. colonial coverage in the name of mediation ✍️ Awad Allah Nawi
Does the “quadruple” have come down like a demonic plant? Or was it a tree that we planted with our hands and then surprised us with its roots when it was wound around our neck?!
The quartet – which includes America, Great Britain, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates – was not a spatial creature that infiltrated a hole in the sky of Sudanese politics. It was a fruit once for a seed planted by certain sons of Sudan, when they ran to capitals and opened the doors to the foreign diplomat to reign between the “sons of the same house”.
The story started when the SIT – in the general command was filled, so our politicians sat on the side of the event as spectators in a bloody theater. Then, instead of facing the truth, one of them carried the phone and contacted “the embassy”. Babiker Faisal, Omar Al -Daqir and others were looking for a mediator … not from the inside, but from behind the seas. Hamidati therefore summoned the ambassador and asked that the meeting be made in the presence of water, water ambassadors, Arabia, Great Britain and America. It was the famous meeting that included Anis Hijaz. From there, the quartet came out to exist.
Mediation or guardianship?
The quartet was not satisfied with the surgeon of politics, but rather stipulated himself as a “legitimate doctor” of the reality of Sudan, who reads testimonies and writes for him. She supervised the formulation of the constitutional document, then pushed a fatal fictional agreement, and came from the engineering of Volker Bertis, who played the role of the engineer, the supervisor and the executioner.
When the war broke out, the quartet is no longer a mediator, but rather transformed into an operating room which weaves the cards and reorganizes geography to the size of its interests. The meetings took place in Switzerland, then in London, and today, they are held in the American capital to draw the rest of the body of Sudan with a map that may not remain a place of dignity or sovereignty.
* Egypt and Saudi Arabia: from the wall to the neutral *
Initially, Egypt and Saudi Arabia were the “blocking wall” of any Western plot. But it seems that the water took place under the bridges.
America has raised the Cairo aid stick to soften its position and volunteer on request, and today America finds its support for the Egyptian army and plays again with aid papers. And Saudi Arabia – despite its concerns – is always a close balance between its national security and its economic interests. It will undoubtedly be a doubt, but only does not make a solution and does not attribute a people.
* New colonization … without soldiers *
Here we are in front of a scene in which the command of Sudan is held in the capitals of the world, and our decisions are made without being at the presence table!
Our destiny is drawn in our absence and is signed on fateful papers without consulting to the name of Sudan.
Is there an explanation for this, except that we live a new colonialism, carrying a tie and speaking the language of “freedom and democracy”, while setting up in our body the dagger of the division?
*conclusion:*
We are those who opened the door to the quadruple, and we can only close it.
What has been written in the dark rooms is only erased by the light of the national will.
“Do not talk about freedom dictated by the ambassador … nor a peace engineering by foreign companies.”
Do we write our constitution with our hands … or are we going to wait for the next meeting in Washington?!
⸻
* Conclusion: there is no choice but the national confrontation *
The current scene is not complete without a painful reminder of one of the most political falsification stations in the history of modern Sudan, when the negotiation documents were delivered after the fall of Khartoum to an old sheep, in order to “dialogue” in the name of the armed forces, and speaks on behalf of the State, for nothing that it was in the Bosom of the quartet and the place of its content.
Because we have not put things in his quorum, here is the man today – after giving the capital to a gang, and fled – set fire to a new war of his exile, and to announce an “exiled government” which represents only shame, challenge the world and resign with external money and a weapon that does not know the honor or the battle.
Today, we are on the verge of a new meeting for the quadruple in Washington, and if these countries claim respect for the sovereignty of Sudan, they must start with an explicit and clear declaration by rejecting any “parallel” or “exile” which gives diplomatic coverage, funding or a platform. Do not be satisfied with those whose hands are stained with the blood of the people.
But the responsibility is not on the quadruple alone.
The army and its leaders in particular should assume their mastery. No time for courtesy. State management is not a political luxury – as some people thought – but rather a moral and historical responsibility, which calls for clarity and determination, not to absence and hesitation.
The current moment requires major decisions that preserve the country’s unity, and the world announces that Sudan has men who are not managed from abroad.
And whoever insults the humiliation of it, which is injured by the dead. “”
As the German philosopher Hegel said:
“History is not mercy on weak minds, but maintains only the memory of those who had the courage of the action.”
As for Malik Bin Nabi, he was more informed when he said:
“Colonialism does not enter a field unless its people are colonial from the inside.”
Let’s write – We are not the quartet – the exit page of the crisis.
Leave the first words:
“This is a homeland that is not managed by proxy … and will not be divided into international decrees.”
