The lack of confidence … The Sudan crisis which extends between the fragmentation of the parties and the elites ✍️ d. ALAA IMAD AL -DIN AL -BADRI
Although decades have transmitted to the independence of Sudan, the country is still under the weight of intertwined political, social and economic crises, a large part of which is due to the lack of confidence between the components of the political and social community and the decline in opportunities for integration and national tolerance at a time when these values are supposed to be a basis for the construction of a fair stable state.
At the heart of this crisis, the Sudanese political elites, which are supposed to play the role of the “candle” which lights up the way of the people and leads it towards rise and progress, but reality indicates that these elites have remained for decades concerned by the pursuit of power, which is not part of a complete house, while power was transformed into a means of serving the citizen.
The Sudanese political scene suffers from an unproductive partisan inflation, because there are more than 90 parties recorded without succeeding up to three or four of them by accepting a unified political program or a future future vision. This party dispersion weakens the democratic process and creates a state of political fragmentation which makes the major in charge difficult on the basis of clear, national, development and pluralist foundations. These blocks should be brought together in all political components according to specific programs which move away from personalization and close interests.
One of the problems that the country is also suffering is excessive centrality, where the state is managed by the center, while states are marginalized. Unbalanced development problems between the center and the margin.
Sudan is not an ethnic or culturally unified state but rather a homeland, cultures and multiethnic religions. It is an error to impose a unified form of national identity without respect for existing diversity. The imposition of integration by force is not the rejection born while respecting privacy and peaceful coexistence leads to a real unit based on mutual assessment.
If authority is the apparent aspect of the crisis, then wealth is the essence of the conflict between political blocks. With marginalization and historical injustice.
The equation of the stable state is not complete without a unified national army which does not follow partisan or tribal loyalty, but is only subject to civil status and its only task is to protect the borders of Sudan, its sovereignty and national security, and not of interference in political affairs.
The project to build the new Sudan cannot be based on the same rules of the past, no rebirth without real national reconciliation, no peace without justice or democracy without effective parties and clear programs or unity without respect for diversity. Perhaps the first step begins with the sincere recognition that the defect in the elites before the rules and the desire to be able before the desire to reform.
