Personal proof and vision: from the battle of dignity to the establishment of the modern Sudanese state ✍️ d. Abu al -Tayyib Adam Hassan Suleiman
Personal proof and vision: battle battle arenas at the establishment of the modern Sudanese state
Sudan goes through a precise stage in its history, where the battle of dignity is intertwined and crowds in order to stay with the battle of the dream of building the modern Sudanese state. At the heart of this moment, the team is the first corner of Abdel -Fattah Al -Burhan, the head of the council of transitional sovereignty, carrying his deep military heritage and his conscious political vision, combining excellence in the battlefield and insisting on the opening of the way to the Democratic constitutional state.
= Military experience and ability to resist
The military experience of the evidence has added beyond discipline and decision-making. This gave him strategic patience, a good reading of the field and the ability to manage crises with the smallest losses. The military commander who trains on the fronts of the conflict has realized that victory is not obtained by force alone, but by the alliances studied, and the wisdom in the treatment of the interior and the foreigner. Consequently, its strength came by preserving the unity of the army and preventing its collapse, because it is the valve of the security of the Sudanese state.
And he is a military leader who succeeded in the decisive battles of dignity until the end of the rebellion against the Sudanese state, realizing that real victory is not measured on the ground, but also to establish a rule of law and institutions. Consequently, he continued to confirm that the role of the army is to protect the country and ensure its transition, not to replace the civil status. He opened the door to a constitutional dialogue and made clear references that the participation of civil forces, youth and women is not a secondary choice, but rather the essence of the modern Sudanese state project.
= Social and political dimensions
The project of proof did not stop at the limits of security, but rather extended to tribal and social reconciliations, in order to fill the flaw in a society exhausted by wars and divisions. He also worked to offer a path of institutional reform for the public service and the national economy, in order to punctuate the reform of the military establishment, realizing that balanced development is the real support for political stability.
= Regional and international dimension
In a very complex regional and international environment, the proof benefited from its military experiences to build a balanced network which preserves the sovereignty of the Sudanese decision and provides it with the necessary support. He thinks that Sudan cannot be built in isolation, but at the same time, it cannot be managed by an external decision. Consequently, he maintained the approach of “openness without dependence”, combining national independence and positive partnerships. Consequently, we find him saying on several occasions: “The military victory in his battle is that dignity protects the fatherland and restores its prestige and its majesty and maintains its unity and its cohesion, but the greatest challenge remains on the way of rebuilding the State after the destruction, systematic ruin and the implementation of the voluntary return program for the countries of the person who were submitted And the Sudanese flight affirm that the Sudanese people dream.
This explains the key to the personality of proof and his double role: a military leader on the battlefield, and at the same time the head of a state where he managed to excel at three levels:
–
1. In the battle of military dignity:
Experience in the field: Al -Burhan has long been used in the fields of internal and external fights (Darfour – Borders – participating in the Peace Conservation Forces), which gave it the capacity to read the field with precision.
Flexible leadership: adopted a tactical method based on the use of the resources available with the greatest efficiency, while preserving the morale of the forces.
Management of the Alliance: Understand that the victory of the battle is not only obtained by military power, but also with political and regional alliances which preserve the back of the state.
Resolve under pressure: showed the ability to persevere in critical moments, which has strengthened the confidence of the army as commander.
–
2. In the construction of the modern Sudanese state:
His superiority in the field of dignity was more aware than with the glory of the pistol, a progressive roadmap must
The way for the opening of civil forces:
When agreed with the selection of Dr. Kamel Idris, Prime Minister of Transition, in order to provide spaces for civilians to participate in the political process, realizing that civil status is only built by a large partnership.
Focus on the constitution and dialogue: to make constitutional dialogue at the center of the construction of the State, as the means of ensuring the unity and stability of the country.
= The balance between security and policy: it has not been authorized for security escapes which threaten the state and, at the same time, stressed that the army does not replace elected civil institutions.
–
3. The combination of the two floors:
The proof has managed to excel in the battle of military dignity thanks to discipline and experience on the field, and at the same time, cast his eye in the way the military victory without a civil project will lead to a new session of the conflict. Consequently, he sought to provide a deep strategic vision which redefines the identity of Sudan on the basis of:
1. National Unit: Overcoming ethnic, tribal and regional divisions in favor of a complete national project.
2. Constitutional dialogue: establish a permanent constitution which expresses the Sudanese people in all its components, and establishes the rule of law and institutions.
3. Development and economy: reconstructing the national economy in a way that opens the door to investment, offers employment opportunities and restores confidence between the citizen and the state.
4. Sovereign and independence: preserving the independence of the Sudanese decision in the regional and international intertwined environment, with openness to positive partnerships.
Consequently, it can be said that the evidence seeks to be the bridge of transit towards the modern Sudanese state, a country which goes beyond contracts of conflict and coup d’etat, and establishes a new social contract which reaches stability and restores Sudan in its natural position in its Arab, African and international environment
