Sudanese political parties … between the failure of the experience and the persistence of the return ✍️ d. ALAA IMAD AL -DIN AL -BADRI
What is surprising and surprised on the Sudanese political scene is the insistence of certain political parties that failed to manage the country during three successive democratic periods to adhere to the request for return to power without providing real internal journals or reforms.
This unjustified insistence reflects a clear separation of reality, especially since these parties have lost the confidence of the street following acute internal divisions, the absence of a universal national vision and the lack of credibility between them and their components, as well as the ignorance of the errors of the past which have led to suffocated economic and political crises which lasted decades.
The worst part of this is that some of them have recourse to the transport of weapons claiming to defend rights and apply democracy through the crater of the weapon, which is a blatant contradiction that the Ethiopia camps, which have become in various periods of platforms to mobilize their elements and confront the Sudanese armed forces under the prerequisite of their political expression which is based on the political regime Based on the political structure on the political regime which describes the forces describe as “holistic”, twists the legacy and the narrow loyalty of the family.
There are among these parts that do not have the capacity to govern and do not leave the field so that others judge that he sees the scene adhering without presenting a real project to advance the state carrying ideological agendas which do not comply with the reality and the diversity of Sudanese society, not to mention its effort to transfer a great popular “imported”.
What Increases The Scene Complicated by the Emergence of Some Political Symbols that fluctuate in its positions, such as the chameleons in a clear and shocking way, as it is is clear that it do not carry a real national project but rast beer serves external agendas that see Permanent Instability in a way that serves the interests of parts that do not want this country to rise or settle that such practices not only threaten the unity of the country but rather obstructs any serious political transition.
Sudanese political reality requires a serious and courageous examination. The non -organized partisan multiplicity and the multiplication of fragile entities contributed only to the confusion of the scene and to the dispersion of efforts and to the perpetuation of a state of incapacity to provide real alternatives to the Sudanese citizen who was exhausted by crises and which is impatient for a decent life in a stable state and which is able to reach its aspirations.
It is time to reflect seriously on the restructuring of partisan work and perhaps proceeding to reduce the number of parties in three major political blocks based on clear national programs and to absorb the political and intellectual diversity of the country. The country no longer tolerates political falsification and the Sudanese citizen no longer has the luxury pending.
Follow us
