The future of the Sudanese state between political illusion and bitter truth ✍️ d. ALAA IMAD AL -DIN AL -BADRI
It is painful to recognize that Sudan is held today on the verge of an abyss not only following a war which destroyed the infrastructure and tore the social fabric, but rather because it has unambiguously revealed the depth of the structural defect of the administration of the State and our continuous failure as an elite and a society in the face of our crises with courage and responsibility.
One of the most complex challenges of the Sudanese crisis is the absence of a sincere desire to recognize errors, whether they are committed by successive regimes or in which we have contributed as a society with our silence or our collusion. The explosion only, the more we ignore the facts, the more we pay the price we pay.
Our collective mentality is always politically and socially captive, whether for the logic of exclusion or hegemony, we demand democracy, but we reject its results if it does not return to our favor. We are talking about pluralism, but we do not make the difference in opinion or cultural or ethnic background. The Sudanese and unless we realized that we are faced with a real crossroads, we risk the future of an entire homeland.
The reality is simply that we have two options that have no third:
• Either we start the real national path of recovery through recognition, disclosure, serious reconciliation and the construction of a full political project.
• Or we continue to turn in the same vicious circle until we reached the inevitable end of the country by dividing the States and breaking the entity of the remaining Sudanese State.
In the light of this partisan dispersion and the absence of real national programs for a large number of political parties, it has become necessary to think seriously about the restructuring of the Sudanese political scene in a way that guarantees a real representation of the interests of the people, not just an elite struggle for power.
Faced with the state of the division and partisan fragmentation which deepened the national crisis, the urgent need to re-establish the Sudanese political scene from its roots demonstrated the experience in a way that calls for a doubt that the current political parties of various specters have not succeeded in providing a real national alternative and are occupied at this point of struggle and their narrow gains. The solution of all existing political parties must be considered as part of a complete national reform project, and not as a political liquidation, this is a necessary step to build a new political environment based on programs, and not loyalty, institutions or individuals.
In this context, it becomes necessary to adopt a new law for the parties which clearly organize political life and to explicitly prevent the parties because of the basis of the sectarian or religious tribal tribe and that three parties are made up of all the political components present on the field, and one of these three parties is required to provide a complete national vision and a realistic program which can be implemented within the framework of the State of Citizen and Law. Its pluralism is a tool to build a state, not to dismantle it.
In order to get out of this vortex, a new political will and a state of mind and different tools and tools adapting to the size of the crisis are no longer acceptable to deal with the fate of a homeland with close calculations or temporary treatments that do not affect the essence of the problem on political and intellectual elites to realize that this step does not tolerate the court to “discipline” is clearly biased Slogans as much as we need moral courage and a national conscience, and if we do not seize this opportunity to rebuild the Sudanese state on new foundations, we love it, or not, we will witness a darker future that we are considering.
