Public proceedings in Sudan: between the challenges and the expected role ✍️ d. Abu al -Tayyib Adam Hassan Suleiman
The accusation is one of the fundamental pillars of justice and the rule of law, because it is a question of moving the criminal case, investigating crimes and ensuring that the sentence is not implemented. But in Sudan, with the complexities of the current stage, the accusation finds the same thing before major responsibilities and complex challenges that threaten its ability to play its historical role.
Complex challenges: —-
The first thing the prosecution is confronted is the political and complex security circumstance, because armed conflicts interfere with political divisions, which makes the independence of its often threatened decisions. There is the weakness of the institutional structure, whether in terms of material capacities or human frameworks, as well as the absence of modern survey systems.
In addition, repeated political interventions and the inheritance of impunity have weakened the confidence of the Sudanese street in justice. Complex crimes such as war crimes and cross crimes are formed an additional burden on a device that already suffers from limited capacities.
The expected role: –
Despite these challenges, the expected role of public prosecution remains essential. It is necessary:
Establish the rule of law translates into justice the authors without favoritism or exception.
Contributing to transitional justice, revealing violations and submitting solid files to the competent courts.
Improve independence so that its decisions become safe from political pressures.
Building institutional capacities thanks to the training and use of modern technology in file management and surveys.
International cooperation to combat cross crimes and benefit from global experiences.
We also hope that you understand and absorb the Attisar Ahmed Abdel -Aal prosecutor General Ahmed Abdel -Aal as the first woman to take over this file, and we also count that there is a violent and beating conflict under the belt which has harmed Sudan in the international forums on the dependence of the human rights file and its relations with public proximity, the Ministry of Justice and the National Commission:
But we remember and say the following
–
First: public prosecution
An independent constitutional system, led by the Attorney General.
His basic tasks: —-
Move the criminal case and investigate crimes.
The prosecution of the perpetrators of criminal violations, including human rights violations in Sudan, and it is the first battle of Sudan in the next stage.
External coordination in the human rights file is not undertaken, but its role is limited to internal judicial measures. But this is not prevented from being represented or a representative in the management of the human rights file abroad.
Second: the Ministry of Justice
A government agency takes over:
Representing the State before international and regional organizations and bodies.
Prepare and submit periodic reports on international obligations in Sudan in the field of human rights.
External coordination with the United Nations, the Human Rights Council, the African Union and relevant organizations.
Consequently, it is the main authority responsible for the human rights file on the outside side.
Third: the National Commission for Human Rights
An independent organization is supposed to operate according to the principles of Paris.
His roles: —-
Control of human rights conditions within the country.
Receive complaints and monitor violations.
Submit recommendations to government and parliament.
The state does not represent the outside, but rather increases its independent relationships and plays an advisory and advisory role.
📌 Conclusion
The external coordination of human rights directly follows the Ministry of Justice.
The public accusation remains a judicial part concerned by the surveys and internal responsibility.
The National Commission plays an independent control and consultant.
Future road: –
The Sudanese scene puts public prosecution before two options: either to get up with its responsibilities and to transform itself into a fierce institution for justice and the rights of citizens, in coordination and integration with judicial and legal organizations in Sudan or remain powerless thanks to conflicts and the struggle which represents Sudan abroad and forgets its real work, so it loses its position and increases the position and Sudan abroad and forgets the state and society.
. The reform route begins to update legislation, improve transparency and ensure the independence of the accusation, so that this device is able to face the challenges of the scene and make a fairer future for Sudan.
.
