Lying “chemical weapons”: when lie becomes a weapon in the information war – something for the house
Davi, in the midst of armed conflicts, battles are not limited to traditional battlefields, but rather extending to a broader and more dangerous space: the space of the information war. It is a war in which false news, deceptive rumors and malicious declarations as a deadly arma aimed at spreading chaos, distorting facts and influencing the morale of the masses. Recently, we continued with great regret of a declaration claiming that there are traces of chemical weapons in the Sudanese capital, Khartoum. A declaration does not have the simplest criteria of credibility, but at the same time, it transports malicious messages and clear objectives, revealing a dense intention to hinder efforts to restore security and stability in the country.
This misleading statement, which comes on the one hand unknown, is not only a new transitional, but rather a link in a series of systematic lies which aim to achieve political and military objectives. The time to launch this rumor is never a coincidence. At a time when efforts are made to restore normal life in the capital and to encourage citizens to return voluntarily to them, this declaration comes to pour oil on fire, and it is located inside people with a new fear, and their resolution is deleted. The goal is clear: obstruct the return of normal life and maintain the standing state of instability, to serve certain agendas that the country does not want to recover.
These systematic lies, in which various media influence the tools are used, are not based on any scientific evidence or field survey. Are soil or air samples taken? Is it analyzed in reliable laboratories? Have official reports published international organizations concerned? The answer is simply “no”. These allegations are only media bubbles, which are launched in the digital space, to spread the speed of lightning, and some believe them because of the lack of consciousness, or because of the state of tension and confusion that people experience.
Responsibility in this case is not only the responsibility of those who launch these rumors, but also for all of us, as individuals and media institutions. We must be more careful and vigilant, and do not contribute to the spread of lies without checking them. Each participation or re -tweet of false news is a bullet called the body of the fatherland. Our duty lies in the question of questioning all the information that is not based on a reliable source, in the search for truth and in the support of national institutions that work to restore security and stability.
Those behind these sabotage programs use information war tools with all professionalism. They know that modern war is no longer limited to military power, but is rather based on the ability to control spirits and directing public opinion. They aim to weaken the internal front, cause sedition and cause a division between the people. They want people to see their enemy everywhere, even in the air, they breathe and in the ground on which they walk.
However, faced with this fierce attack, we must have a clear strategy. First, there should be an official and decisive official response, refuting these lies and revealing their lie. The institutions concerned, in good health or in safety, must issue clear and documented data, reassure people and lie to these allegations. There must also be coordination between these institutions, to prevent the spread of rumors and provide precise and reliable information to the public.
Second, national media must play a major role in this battle. The media should be the voice of reason and the voice of truth. The media must provide deep analyzes, which reveal the hidden programs behind these rumors. The media should give priority to check the news before publishing it and be an example of credibility and professionalism.
Third, the citizens themselves must be very aware. People should learn to distinguish between sincere and false news. They must realize that each word they share can have a significant impact on security and stability in their country. They must be “soldiers” in the battle of truth and help build a conscious and fortified society against lies.
In the end, we must realize that the information war is not only a transient phenomenon, but rather an essential part of contemporary conflicts. It is a war in which the word, image and information are used as a weapon. It is a war in which we test our ability to distinguish between truth and lie, and between truth and deception. In this battle, we can only win if we are united, and if we are armed with knowledge and conscience, and if we are determined to protect our country from all lies that threaten its security and stability. Our support for our national army in its battle is not only on the battlefield, but also in the field of truth, where we are faced with hope, the deception of conscience and chaos in the regime.
