What happened before the European Parliament against (Ahmed Nadi and Walid Madbo) is a mini-rehability for what is more serious and more serious with regard to Sudan in the future. ? Abu al -tayeb Adam Hassan Suleiman
Yes, what has happened in the European Parliament can be considered a microcosm and early experience of what the figures associated with the militias and political entities which are linked to crimes in Sudan can be confronted, when they return to the future in the country, especially if there is a transitional justice which gives the Sudanese the supreme word in the responsibility of those who have been involved in a means of killing, looting, have a repression.
The event shows several important indicators:
1. The awareness of Sudanese communities abroad: the demonstrations of which the European Parliament confirms are no longer limited to Sudan, but rather extends to immigrants who have effective pressure tools, such as the media, protest and influence on international institutions have started to play a more effective role in pressure on governments and international institutions to be a counter for those who are associated with this militia. What happened in the European Parliament is one of the most important examples of this interaction
2. The growing popular rejection of the symbols associated with Janjaid: all those who appear or deal with these bodies are confronted today with a large popular rejection, and this rejection will be more extended within Sudan after the end of the war and the start of the state construction process.
3. International Began Institutions to Take A Clear Position: The European Parliament’s Apology and its Retreat from inviting these personalities gives a clear indication that western institutions have begun to the voice of the sudanese victim, and understand the dimensions of the crisis better, and that the abolition of the invitation caries Strong symbolism, which is a warning that the general presence and the participation in official events are not grants automatically for those who have been caught in human rights crimes and international institutions have become an increased sensitivity to popular and journalistic pressure in the violations file.
4. The next popular or legal justice: this rejection and the mobilization of the public against them abroad, it can in fact be a preliminary image of what they can be confronted with Sudan from popular requests for trials or at least isolation of public affairs, and it is our battle and the battle of all Sudanese and its categories in the near future.
A summary:
What happened is a “rehearsal” of what is greater. If it is the size of the rejection and pressure abroad, the situation at home can be more serious and more serious, especially if the community participates in the formulation of a new future for a free Sudan which is dominated by justice, and to all those who check its hand with blood or turn their backs to the right, and in terms of civil society people to demand responsibility and problems.
Follow us
