Secret of negotiations and popular will – scattered fragments – ✍️ Zulnurain Nasr al-Din al-Lawyer
The internal negotiation kitchen is multifaceted and multidirectional, and everyone aims with their bow, relying either on the external stick or on the internal carrot of weak forces that do not have a popular base and have a voice and a strong voice without influence. All initiators, whether institutions or states, believe that they are ineffective and will not make any progress or breakthrough in Sudanese affairs because they are working against the popular will, with the exception of the individual Egyptian initiative without the Quartet because it is linked to strategic interests. And his wish between the two countries is that Egypt’s national security is linked to the stability of Sudan and the remaining imposed initiatives and programs that intertwine with the struggle of unilateral interests for geographical spoils destined to disappear and cease to exist. Otherwise, what is the rational justification for the presence of the UAE in an initiative in which neutrality is assumed, let alone managing, sponsoring, financing and supporting the killings and displacement of the Sudanese (as executioners and rulers) while the world witnesses our rivalry in the corridors of international courts?
People are tired of numerous experiences and training based on interests, whether quadruple or quintuple. They are a source of harm or danger to Sudan and the Sudanese, and they work to achieve their own interests and not to bring benefits or establish peace in Sudan.
It is naive on the part of those who think that the Quartet is a bringer of good or a messenger of peace, or that they are motivated by a humanitarian, moral or moral motive in order to stop the massacres, lift the siege of El Fasher and return the displaced to their homes. But this is a hidden and dastardly conspiracy to complete the framework project through the hands and tongues of those who depend on work and livelihood and earn a comfortable living with the blood of children. And the remains of the people
Those leading the project of dismantling and eliminating the human race of the Sudanese people since 2019 have been humiliated and humiliated before the popular conscience.
Negotiations or political solutions to any conflict or war are an option available through a politics of fait accompli and identification with absent international laws. Whoever refuses this in principle will receive arrows of punishment, hostility will be activated and the rod of law will be imposed on them as seed to strike those who oppose their emboldened justice. Despite all the selectivity and the sword of the siege, the people did not oppose the negotiations or the secret visits of Al-Burhan which pave the way for the salvation of the militia. Due to his confidence in the military establishment led by Al-Burhan and the firm national promise that there will be no militia in the future of the country, and that all the Sudanese people have absolute confidence in the external and internal meetings of Al-Burhan through the historic gathering of the people and their armed forces in the Battle of Karama, and that Lieutenant General Al-Burhan or the negotiators of the stages advances will negotiate in the spirit, impulse and feelings of the Sudanese people and their categorical rejection of the military and political militias. Returning with the wing of the Quartet to dominate the neck of the people after the crimes and violations he committed and which are incomprehensible to the human spirit of his people.
The Sudanese people believe that the ongoing secret negotiations are based on political, tactical or security factors, and that early announcement of the negotiation program may lead to their failure and may be met with popular rejection or internal mobilization, especially since the Sudanese political environment is full of accusations and skepticism and the lack of influence of the media and public opinion on the agenda. Furthermore, one of the reasons for secrecy is the weakness or absence of popular and official institutions that decide in such situations, which requires… Unified popular decision. Unfortunately, the popular role is currently almost absent as institutions since 2019, with intention and bad faith, but that does not mean that it is without influence or voice. The government of hope can create a real consultative mechanism with the people, even if only temporarily, by involving real societal forces such as popular resistance, civil administrations, trade unions and national federations in Sudanese affairs related to their interests and providing popular support for any national negotiation or dialogue to gain strength, national dimension and legitimacy. People should not hear about the final rule after it has been prepared in closed rooms without community participation, and made public and implemented acquiescingly and as a fait accompli. The agreement will then not find the fertile ground on which it will develop, nor an appropriate environment to shape the future. Rather, we will face a disaster more dangerous than the consequences of the current war, caused by the absence of popular will and decision and by the representation of political forces and elites exhausted by the decision-making process. The people falsely and slanderously
After this war, we must learn many lessons and lessons, and the people have the right to participate in making any fateful decision related to the future of Sudan.
Removing the leaders from embarrassment may not be in the interest of the Sudanese people
And to make the announcement of any agreement dependent on internal approval, and not on imposed external supervision which lacks the foundations of justice and the national dream.
