The conflict of the interlocutor and the language of interests – between the lines – ✍️ Zulnurain Nasr al-Din al-Lawyer
The whole world speaks a single language, that of interests, which takes precedence over all international values and norms that govern international agreements between countries. There is no capacity for soft diplomacy based on ethics and recognition of the sovereignty and legitimacy of governments. are vibrant in popular consciousness. The language of interests is sometimes rigid and flexible at other times, and anyone who is good at it and knows its secrets will remain stable and proud within coalition systems called international hubs whose interests are closely intertwined. each other.
Our relations with Russia remained at the center of attention. Russians are closer in consciousness to the Sudanese people than to American hegemony, perhaps because of the respect and appreciation they have in their relations with other peoples and the genetic dissonance with them. values of Sudanese society from the axis and American arrogance.
Through this war, emotions and feelings united and people gathered around the armed forces to face existential challenges. Despite the divergent opinions of different schools of thought in Sudan regarding the performance of the army and the management of the war, the inevitable choice and current circumstances demand it. alignment under the command of the armed forces.
The visit of the Russian Deputy Foreign Minister had an impact on the military and political transformation of relations between the two countries and on the war in Sudan, as well as on Russia's support for the sovereignty and existing legitimacy of the Sudan and on its rejection of foreign interference in the affairs of Sudan and the projects of tore the unity of the country and dealt a heavy blow to the enemies of Sudan and destabilized the American axis identified with aggression, revitalizing thus Sudanese diplomacy until reaching a great understanding between the two countries.
Russia, through its independent institutions and enterprises in previous periods, has distinguished itself in its relations with militias in the interests of its own interests. It strengthened its relations with militias outside state authority, thereby expanding the perimeter along its entire length. and the size of the country. Wagner expanded his influence without government controls. Recent developments in our relations with Russia must be subject to careful study and careful reading of international dimensions, the most important of which is mutual respect which expresses mutual respect. goals and objectives and achieving the interests behind the agreements, and not exploiting the current situation as a position of internal weakness of the Russian side, and not rushing to sign and make concessions on many provisions of the agreements and treaties that take away the right to sovereignty, and that contracts and agreements are signed according to a strategic vision for future generations and the future of Sudan, preserving its resources and capabilities such as a balanced and balanced partnership, achieving the objectives of equality and pride of ours. natural ability.
The resources, economies and natural wealth that Sudan possesses are not found in any country in the world. It is therefore the struggle and the conflict which resulted in this global war.
We must first verify that we must completely cut off communication and interests with the rebel militias and not play on the strings of relations like all countries in search of interests. Sudan is no more expensive in terms of rapprochement, communication and customs than Ukraine to Russians. , but international plans and the struggle for hegemony imposed the war as a security cordon through NATO on Russia and Russia. Of course, she envisages African alliances to break international isolation.
The strategic framework and good reading govern assessments of common interests and international relations
It is necessary to move from momentary emotion to deeper reflection to build relationships with any other country.
The axis (Russia, China, Turkey, Iran) is closer to the Sudanese situation than others, and cooperation with these countries will impose a reality other than the will of the crude axis which manipulates the rights of peoples and is classified by them as “These radical transformations of recent times require the formation of an agile government with an international dimension. To manage this sensitive issue, countries in the West and East treat military governments with extreme caution, so that the armed forces focus primarily on vulnerable peoples. operations file, to integrate the internal work system and end the war in a short period of time to rebuild and establish a state with new foundations and new standards.
