American victories and sanctions – Scenes and evidence –

The United States has imposed sanctions on the Sudanese army commander, Abdel -Fattah al -burhan. Previously, according to the sources that were talking, these sanctions are in the context of the accusations against the Sudanese armed forces of violations which include the targeting of civilians and civil infrastructure, as well as the prevention of the arrival of humanitarian aid.

* One of the sources, an enlightened diplomat, confirmed that the Sudanese army’s refusal to participate in peace talks during the past year was one of the most important reasons that prompted Washington to make this decision. In this context, he reviews the analytical reading of the dimensions of this American decision, his calendar and the reasons, in addition to the possible effects on the path of military and political determination in Sudan, and the measures that the Sudanese government must take to meet these challenges

* Pressure on the Sudanese army: the decision indicates an American attempt to influence the dynamics of the conflict in Sudan, and perhaps to obstruct the decision of the determination which goes in favor of the army and the government.

* The support signal for other powers, as sanctions can reflect a bias in the United States to parties or groups opposing the army, in particular the light of mutual accusations concerning violations and responsibility for the humanitarian crisis. American reasons for the imposition of sanctions can be analyzed by the following: human pressure and use. The question of human rights violations and the targeting of civilians as a major tool to justify sanctions, in particular with famine relationships, food lack and prevention of humanitarian aid. It seems that Washington’s diplomacy seeks to restore Sudan at the negotiating table through a smallness of the sanctions tools, after the army and the government rejected sovereign prejudices to participate in the unjust and impartial talks in Geneva. Regional balance means that the United States see Sudanese military progress a threat to broader regional stability, in particular in the light of the influence of Sudan on neighboring countries such as Libya, Ethiopia and Chad

* We continue







Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button