Bear events: the conflict of individuals, no complete tribal conflict – something for the fatherland – ✍️ Mr. Salah is strange
The city of Al -Dabba in the state of the North recently experienced unhappy events which led to victims and injuries, which caused a general concern concerning the nature of these confrontations and their repercussions on social peace. In the midst of the inconsistency of information and rumors, the statement of the government government came to put the points on the letters, stressing that what happened was not a complete tribal conflict between Kababish and Huwair, but rather a development of the individual skirmishes between a limited number of people in bloody confrontations due to the summons of each party to support their parents.
What was confirmed by the spokesman for the State government, the Minister of Culture and Information in charge of Al -Baqir Okasha Othman, is extremely important to understand the roots of the problem. Admittedly, the events began as “skirmishes between a limited part of the stomachs of the Kababish and Huwair tribes, some of which are suspected of involvement in illegal smuggling activities” which eliminate the real reason behind the first spark. This means that the problem is not an authentic dispute between the two tribes in the budget and mayors, but rather the result of individual behavior linked to criminal activities.
The convocation of “people’s support” was the contradictory parties was the turning point which exacerbated the situation of the skirmishes limited to the bloody confrontations which killed four citizens. This gives “the bad impression that the question is a dispute between the two tribes at the side and the mayors, which is the opposite of reality”, as indicated by the declaration. Here is the danger of the interpretation of events in an erroneous way, this would nourish sedition and widen the scope of the conflict to affect wider social components which have nothing to do with the original dispute.
The urgent intervention of the armed forces and the other regular forces, which led to the confinement of the situation, to the dissolution of the clashes and to the total control of the situation. This rapid intervention underlines the importance of the security role in preserving lives and goods and prevention of aggravation of crises. The affirmation of the government government according to which “the law will follow its course and will not be tolerated with all those who participated, incited or provoked these events”. It is a clear message to all those who have begged to destabilize security or to exploit individual disputes to light sedition. Imposing the prestige of the State and the application of the law is the only way to ensure that such pain events are not repeated.
The invitation of the Minister of Culture and Information in charge of “all citizens to control the Self, adheres to the values of societal peace and will not be trained in calls for sedition or incentive” occurs at the time. Societies that slide in the swamps of separation and violence are only destroying and losing. Northern Sudan, its ancient history and the unity of its social fabric, cannot tolerate such a shift. By preserving civil peace and peaceful coexistence among all the tribal components, it is a collective responsibility for everyone.
In conclusion, we must learn from the bear events that rush to judge things and classify them as “tribal conflicts” can be misleading and dangerous. Many conflicts begin individual or criminal disputes, but are exacerbated by the absence of wisdom and precipitation to summon tribal support, which leads to serious repercussions throughout the company. Hope remains to comment on the vigilance and consciousness of society, its commitment to the values of tolerance and cooperation, and its position in the face of all those who try to avoid sedition.
Follow us
