Did Profess Kamel Idris violate the Juba peace agreement? Directed by the ministers of the exemption or the violation of the peace of peace? – The winner of Al -Dai – ✍️ d. Mohamed Tabidi
– the context of the agreement and its conditions
The Sudanese government and several armed movements have signed several “Juba peace agreements” on October 3, 2020, in order to end the conflict contracts in Darfur, the Nuba mountains and the Nile of the South Blue. The “Power Sharing” protocol stipulates that these movements are represented by four ministerial seats within the transitional government, and this representation cannot be modified or prejudicial, except with the mutual consent of all signed parts. During the Conference for the Evaluation of the Recently bound agreements (United Nations, African Union and IQAD), one of the members of the Transitional Sovereignty Council stressed that “the Juba agreement should only be modified through an agreement signed by all parties”, warning the danger of any attempt to “confuse or cancel”
The Prime Minister, Professor Kamel Idris, raped the agreement?
That day, a discussion was raised on a decision by Professor Kamel Idris, the Prime Minister, to exempt the government, including ministers from armed movements or their exclusion from some of the specializations or government responsibilities.
Any Change in the Formation of the Minister Falls Under the Protocol of “Power Sharing”, and requires the nomination of the alternative from the body represented by the armed movement itself, and not a unilateral decision for the prime minister alone, it is not possible to prove the existence of a violation by the prime minister of the juba agrement That Any Cabinet Reshuffle for these requires Bags in Advance Coordination with the Armed Movements in Accord with the text of the Agrement.
Causes of confusion and logic in zigzag
Some activists believe that the leaders of armed movements hold their ministerial seats reflecting “part of an agreement that gave them positions”, which leads them to accuse any government’s decision of targeting them, although it is a coordination of the protocol.
4. How to get out of this winding logic?
1. Refer to the written texts: the “mini committee” stipulated in the authority’s sharing protocol must be activated to examine any ministerial decision concerning armed movements and to document each change in writing with the approval of the competent parties.
2. Declaration of decrees and directives: the Prime Minister and the Sovereign Council must issue unified declarations for each amendment, with the inclusion of their text justifications and approvals of the signed parties.
3. Establish an independent regulatory mechanism: it includes representatives of armed movements, civil society organizations and the tripartite mechanism, to review the implementation of the Juba agreement periodically and to ensure that the rights of the original parties are not compromised.
4. Publish periodic reports: on the tripartite mechanism and inform the government to publish quarterly reports on the implementation of the terms of the agreement, including ministerial representation, security and justice, to reassure public opinion and rumors.
In short, a Kamel Idris professor published a justified decree to exempt or replace the ministers of armed movements without coordination with them, and this is what I think to be final, and any accusation of violating the agreement is a whirlwind in a cup created by the ambiguity of powers, the lack of transparency and the souls of the criminals. In order to get out of this winding logic, it is necessary to return to the original texts, to activate the supervision mechanisms and to disclose each decision in writing and with the approval of all the parties and that the citizen has adequate information so that a victim of black souls does not fall.
I will write to the homeland until my last breath
