Hamdok.. Will the British promise to pay Gordon's blood price?? – Affairs and Concerns – ✍️ Al-Tayeb Qism Al-Sayyid
*affairs and sorrows*
*Hamdok.. Will the British promise to pay Gordon's blood money*??
*Al-Tayyib Qasm Al-Sayyid*
The title of this article, the idea for which was born from a brilliant article I read, and which was sent to me privately, by my professor, Dr. Abdel-Azim Awad, former deputy director of the Sudanese radio, renowned radio broadcaster and presenter, former media advisor to the Sudanese Embassy in the Arab Republic of Egypt, Secretary General of the National Press and Publications Council.
My reading of Dr. Abdel Azim's article, on which my comment turned into what you are reading, was part of an unwritten connection between us to exchange what we had written in the pre-release phase.
In order not to expose myself to the article of my professor, Dr. Abdel Azim, to any legal liability, especially since he is a knowledgeable jurist, I quickly informed him, our professor, that I I would write my next article, and this is the one that is in your hands now, based on his article that he sent to me privately, entitled (The Labyrinth of Hamdok).
Dr. Abdel Azim Awad, at the beginning of his sober article, highlighted a possibility closer to reality than the organization of Dr. Abdallah's visit.
Hamdok to the last Britain, costing him and those with him a painful and humiliating historic slap in the face from the British Sudanese, during a visit carefully timed by the host to coincide with Britain taking over the presidency of the Security Council this month. , a moment that coincided with the widespread violations carried out by the Rapid Support militia in the Eastern Regions, which sparked widespread disapproval and condemnation in various parts of the world, the most recent being condemnation of violations by of the American Congress. the rebel terrorist militia Al-Daglo Qajar… which, according to them, is helping to crystallize the idea of sending UN forces under the pretext of protecting civilians in Sudan, to create so-called safe no-fly zones and to propose a draft resolution in this regard to the UN Security Council, noting that Britain also currently assumes the task of what is known in Security Council circles as the spokesperson.
Dr. Abdel Azim Awad's article adds that Hamdok's interest and willingness to rely on foreigners is not a coincidence, but rather an approach that was imposed on him, which even included his salary and that of his assistants to the Council of Ministers during these miserable days. an unprecedented precedent in the management of a country supposed to enjoy sovereignty and independence.
While the actions of the famous UN envoy, Volker Peretz, and his moves that violated state sovereignty were clearly visible to the point that some described him as the main sponsor of the framework agreement, including Hemedti finally admitted that he was the reason for the outbreak of war. after having previously received it and accepted its packaging.
My professor, Dr. Abdel Azim, went on to say, in his profound and sarcastic article, entitled (The Labyrinth of Hamdok), that according to the view of the two parties – Hamdok and Britain – who were Muslims, the chances of success in efforts to approve the entry of international forces into the depths of the current Sudanese Holocaust. Extremely weak, if any – and speaking to Dr Abdel Azim – he attributed this to several reasons, including that the presence of such armed forces is usually linked to the peacekeeping process, not the establishment of this peace. Therefore, their mission comes after the end of fighting or after the conclusion of a truce, so their mission is to maintain peace. The earth… doesn't make peace in the first place. He adds: “No country can throw its soldiers into the flames of the current crushing war. Perhaps the Secretary-General of the United Nations made explicit reference to it last in the Security Council. Last week, when he reserved international intervention in Sudan, he said: “Current circumstances do not permit the use of international forces in the war in Sudan. I would add here that the Secretary-General of the United Nations should have said instead of these words: It is international law which does not allow resorting to the sending of international forces to Sudan, and not the current circumstances which, according to him, do not allow it. According to the case of Sudan.
Dr. Abdel-Azim Awad stressed that the current events in Sudan do not constitute a war between two countries that must be separated by forces wearing blue berets, but rather a legitimate effort by the state, the army and the Sudanese people to eliminate a group that rebelled and took up arms against the state. According to Dr. Abdel Azim's article, this is the truth that some people sometimes forget or ignore!
Taking a closer look at recent history, Dr.'s article argues that the world has repeatedly witnessed the failure of such international interventions in Congo, Rwanda and Bosnia. The truth is that not only did they fail, but they also failed. found themselves fighting one faction against another faction, thus increasing the flames of the fire instead of extinguishing it…
This wise and valuable article concluded that the last act of Hamdok, which extinguished its conflict, spoiled its danger and defused it, was the solemn appeal to the Sudanese of Great Britain, who delivered to Hamdok, the host country and its delegation which accompanied him, a strong, A painful blow that eased the sorrow of the Sudanese people who had been consumed by the flames of the devastating war. The fire was lit by Hamdok executives, its group of outcasts and the sponsors of its workers from oppressive and arrogant countries. .. to facilitate the final chapter of the labyrinth of Hamdok and his passion for everything foreign… and it was he who began by bringing in the German Volker Peretz first as a leader in the shadows, then placed Sudan under what looked like international trusteeship. when it lifted support, it focused only on vital products, such as fuel, in accordance with World Bank policy. He went further with his strange and astonishing admission of the country's involvement in the bombing of the American destroyer Cole on the coast of Australia. Somalia, and forced the oppressed people to pay $350 million in compensation for this imaginary aggression. Perhaps he had heard of a Sudanese anecdote which spread during his visit to Britain, he said: – He will admit that the Sudanese killed Gordon unjustly, and the English will be promised to pay blood money as soon as he returns to power. And I add – for my part – here, I wonder how many billions of dollars Hamdok will commit to paying with the sweat and strength of the people of Sudan who inflicted on them and his group the ravages of 'an overwhelming and devastating war that destroyed their lands and greenery, deprived them of a pure and dignified people and destroyed their structures, facilities and facilities.
I swear there is no intention behind this.
4/November/2024
Guedaref.
