He must (advance) purify himself by disengaging from the militias, before speaking about the threat of armed brigades to the State – whispering letters – ✍️ Dr. Al-Baqir Abdul Qayyum Ali
In the world of media and journalism, honesty and objectivity in transmitting events and information are among the basic principles that a journalist must possess, but sometimes, some fall into the trap of excessive immersion in small and minor details of events, which leads to distracting the attention of the recipient. On the essential points to focus on in the journalistic material he wishes to communicate, and instead of presenting what is objective, we find him neglecting that, sometimes he intentionally misses the most important aspects, and thus gives the reader They may give an inaccurate or incomplete impression on the subject in question, even if some of them possess journalistic abilities and professional acumen, they may find themselves in situations which will inevitably affect their credibility and that of this that they write.
The Taqadum group and its supporters take a critical stance towards Lieutenant General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, Commander-in-Chief of the Popular Armed Forces, and always try to demonize him and accuse him of supporting the presence of the forces and battalions participating in combat alongside the armed forces. The Taqadum group considered the formation of these joint forces completely unacceptable.
At the same time, the “Taqaddum” group is considered a political bloc linked to a number of armed movements, such as the movements of Al-Hadi Idris, Al-Taher Hajar, Abdel Aziz Al-Helu and Abdel Wahed Muhammad Nour, In addition to its association with the Rapid Support militia, all of these movements also represent currents. Political and military forces are working to achieve their own goals, especially in the context of the ongoing conflict in the country, which increases the complexity of the problem. political and military scene of the country.
The Taqaddam group and its supporters want to claim an idealism that they lack. Most Sudanese believe: (A weapon with you is better than a weapon against you), and the army is part of the people, and for this reason. it benefited from all internal armed alliances, in order to get rid of the biggest enemy, which enjoys enormous external support, and that is why the need came to unite all internal forces to face the existential threats which weigh on the State.
After years of war, suffering, displacement and hunger, the Sudanese citizen has become more aware of what is happening around him, and this cumulative awareness is the result of the difficult circumstances he has gone through, which made him more capable of distinguishing promises. and ineffective words, so they began to appreciate the truth more and know where their interests lie, and they cannot be fooled by pretentious and resonant phrases that limit themselves to emotional feelings without providing real solutions.
The slogan launched by the Taqaddam group is (No to war), and all the Sudanese people say, as Taqaddam says, (No to war), but with what understanding? This rejection is not just a general stance against violence, but rather an expression of a deep rejection of the injustice and attacks to which people were exposed throughout the years of war. Therefore, the people do not accept any presence of this militia which committed these acts. the most horrific violations against them, and continues to destroy the country's infrastructure. How can this militia and all those who supported it in one way or another be an integral or subsidiary part of the political scene after all the damage and destruction it has caused?
The people will not accept that those who committed crimes against them be honored or held accountable, nor will they allow their presence in any potential authority in the future. The people also have the right to reject anyone who provided political cover for this militia. Today's popular consciousness cannot ignore the past of those whose hands are stained with blood and violations, and will not forgive those who supported it.
The situation in Sudan is very complex and it is therefore difficult to adopt rigid or absolute positions in such difficult circumstances, and the militias continue to confront the population with killings, looting, rape, forced displacement and demolition infrastructure. It was necessary to form armed groups that would take decisive positions for defense. Regarding the homeland and its protection, the Al-Baraa battalion, like any group that bears arms against the militias that threaten stability, has made very great sacrifices. in order to liberate the lands and the protection of people, and this is why it is entirely natural that their sacrifices are recognized, even if they were part of a context where the presence of military forces outside the framework of the The national army is not privileged. respect goes to the Al-Baraa Battalion or other groups who took up arms in order to liberate the land and preserve honor.
The Taqaddam group must know that there is broad support among the population for these groups who carry weapons and sacrifice their lives as they fight against the Rapid Support Militia in the name of liberation, as they consider them as part of the popular resistance against the forces that displaced them, mistreated them and threatened their security and stability, but we hope that this support will be conditional on the governance of the popular armed forces, and we all await the release of our land and building. of a peaceful and healthy state, far from violence and militias, having achieved the goal for which the Sudanese people came together, namely to get rid of this nightmare.
The Taqaddam group and its supporters are speaking out and criticizing the large number of brigades and armed movements fighting alongside the Sudanese army, seeing them as the core of other militias that will threaten the state in the future. They must first reconsider their connection with the movements in Sudan. Al-Hadi Idris, Al-Tahir Hajar, Abdel-Wahid Muhammad Nour and Abdul Aziz Al-Helu, and above all, he must break his ties with the nation's first enemy.
How can a group that claims to seek stability raise the slogan of peace when it is linked to the forces that contributed to the destruction of the state? It is not reasonable to talk about the danger of militias when these people are directly linked to the sources of chaos, as the proverb says: “The uncircumcised and the uncircumcised.” A progressive group must first purify itself of these links. 'he's really serious. on building a state without violence. And the militias are as you claim, and after all that (the people have a say) in choosing who they want to govern them.
God is behind the intention and He is the guide to the right path
