International treaties between acceptance and rejection in countries of the Islamic world
International treaties are the main pillar of organizing relations between countries, as they aim to improve global peace and development, but countries in the Islamic world face great difficulties in dealing with these treaties, which leads to a clear contrast between Acceptance, Rejection.
International treaties are a necessity or a challenge?: –
The positions of the countries of the Islamic world towards international treaties are divided into three major trends: –
A. Conditional acceptance
Many Islamic countries accept treaties that achieve their interests, but they require that their terms be consistent with Islamic law and national laws.
Free trade agreements that enhance economic development, but without prejudice to cultural and religious sovereignty
For. Rejection or reservation
There is a rejection of certain treaties which are considered incompatible with the teachings of Islam or threatening national sovereignty
Example: –
Reservations by Islamic countries regarding specific provisions of the CEDAW agreement regarding gender equality, which are said to be incompatible with traditional family roles in Islam.
C. Complete integration
This trend is less common, as some countries seek to fully integrate into the international system, regardless of internal challenges, often driven by political or economic pressures.
Reasons for contrast in situations:-
1. Islamic law as a legislative basis: –
Islamic countries adopt Islamic law as a fundamental reference, which makes them refuse or reserve treaties that contradict their principles.
example:-
Refusal to integrate Islamic law into international laws related to inheritance or divorce
2 Colonial heritage and double international standards: –
The long history of colonialism has made Islamic countries skeptical of the intentions of major powers, especially as some treaties show duplication in the application of international laws.
Example: –
Facing Palestinian issues or duplicating the application of humanitarian law in conflict zones
3 and 3 The lack of balance in the drafting of the treaties: –
International treaties are often designed by major countries without real involvement of Islamic countries in the formulation process, leading to a lack of ownership towards these agreements.
4 National Sovereignty Challenges:-
National sovereignty is a key obsession, as some countries see that joining certain treaties opens the door to foreign interference in their internal affairs.
The optimal solution for dealing with international treaties:-
To overcome the challenges and achieve a balance between international obligations and national and religious interests, the following solutions can be adopted:-
A. Regional and Islamic cooperation
Form a unified position among Islamic countries through organizations such as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to coordinate positions towards international issues
B. Support joint negotiations that express the aspirations of Islamic countries and unify their efforts in the international arena
C. Conditional negotiation: –
Emphasizing commitment to treaties compatible with Islamic values, with the rejection of any element that contradicts Sharia law and enhancing participation in the formulation of treaties to ensure the representation of the interests of the Islamic world
D. Education and Awareness:-
People's awareness of the importance of international treaties and how they affect their daily lives
E. . Build legal and diplomatic capacities to train professional negotiators who are able to advocate for Islamic issues
And. Demand international justice:-
Call for reform of the international system to ensure justice in the implementation of international law and reject double standards through
Demand improved transparency and justice in the formulation of treaties to ensure everyone's interests
Countries in the Islamic world face the challenges of their complexity in their relationship with international treaties
But the solution does not lie in blind acceptance or outright rejection; the balance between engaging in the international system and protecting Islamic identity requires a unified position in intelligent negotiation and long-term vision. Tools of domination in the means of justice and joint development in a way that serves the interests of Islamic countries and improves its place in the global arena
