Sudan is unbearable … When is the interest of Sudan above loyalty ✍️ D. ALAA IMAD AL -DIN AL -BADRI
In the light of the accumulated and growing challenges that Sudan is going through, the urgent need to reset the compass of political work and to think deeply and in a responsible manner in the roles of political elites, in particular those which lead the parties and form the characteristics of the national scene.
The nearby experience has proven that the abolition of close partisan loyalty and the constant classification of executives and expertise, according to their political affiliation, produced only more division, weakening state institutions and a waste of energy that could have been used for development and reform.
Unfortunately, the Sudanese political scene still suffers from the deposits of the long conflict, because individuals are reduced to political classifications, and national affiliation presents itself in a later grade at a moment when modern countries are built on the basis of competence, integrity and sincerity in work, we are in Sudan to exclude or marginalize those who do not dominant or are affiliated with another flow.
The political elite under the historical and societal responsibility that it holds today is an affirmation today and more than ever to review its tools and to reassess its performance is not by influence but rather a question of loyalty to the fatherland which deserves the best, insisting on national interest, but even with the mentality of polarization and classification.
It is also important to recognize that the reform of state institutions will not take place without neutralizing them with the integrity of the parties. We cannot expect an active and professional administrative apparatus in light of the control of political loyalty on the articulations of the efficiency of employment, evaluation and progression, it must be the norm and not belonging.
We do not call for the abolition of partisan work, but rather to develop it and update it to follow the pace of the challenges of the current moment. We need parties who believe that the public interest is mainly considerations and not to make political rivalry a means of undermining the state or the failure of its institutions, and that loyalty to the party should not contradict loyalty to the fatherland but rather an extension.
In the end, the story is ruthless and the posts will be recorded not only with what has been said, but with what has been done or abandoned, Sudanese political leaders must reach the level of the scene and put the homeland on close accounts if you want a future that Sudan deserves.
Follow us
