The constants of negotiations in Switzerland – between the lines – ✍️ Dhulnurin Nasruddin, the lawyer
If it is true that it is correct on social networks, the Sudanese sovereign council, the Sudanese sovereign council, met in Switzerland, Massad Paul, the adviser of President Trump, he therefore has the question in assessment of the national interest.
The evidence spoke in the language of the Sudanese people, and he confirmed, according to what was distributed to the adviser of Trump at the Swiss meeting, refusing the existence of the rapid support militia in the future of the Sudanese state, and that there is no place for the militia in the future of Sudan, and that there is no place for the militia in the future of Sudan, and that there is no place And that there is no place for the militia in the future of Sudan, and that there is no room for the militia in the future of Sudan, and that there is no room for the militia in the future of Sudan, and that there is no room for the militia in the future of Sudan, and that there is no room for the militia in the future of Sudan, and that there is no place for the Sudan
This standpoint remains one of the most important constant that are not compromising is the removal of the militia from any role in the future of southern as a group of rebellions and outside the state and its authority has committed severe crimes against the nation and the citizen and is still targeting defenseless and the Militia has known through its brutal aggression that the war is not between Two Parties But Rather an International Ordination to Eradicate The Sudanese Presence from the Global Map
The Sudanese people will not accept any role of military and political militia after this deep injury which affected each Sudanese home
This position is not only a negotiation element or a transient dialogue, but rather a unified mass voice and a strategic popular demand that expresses the national will and the language of each Sudanese injury of this war
There is no doubt that it is the constitutional, political and sovereign law of the president of the sovereign council to lay the foundations of national constants as a key to any national dialogue in which state sovereignty violated and the national values and the team of evidence have exceeded the pillars of dialogue and that
Not that there is a quick support militia in the future of Sudan
And to protect the country’s unity and sovereignty and the use of state authority and its regular institutions. After having confirmed these principles, a negotiation committee can be trained with the participation of national experts who include political, legal and security expertise that manages the file and commitment according to these premises and references to ensure the unity of the situation and not to renounce the rights of the population
Dialogue and negotiations are not weak or concession, but rather an Islamic, moral and humanitarian principle before being a political choice or external pressure and reflects the commitment of the State towards a spirit of responsibility and the prosecution of the citizen
In addition, the lack of adhesion to international laws and standards can expose Sudan to criticism or the condemnation of the international community, which seeks justifications in the light of the imbalance of the system of judicial and legal values, which can be exploited politically against Sudan and cause greater damage
