The explosive proposals and solutions of the Arab and Muslim Summit towards Sudan – the last treatment – ✍️ Khaled Fadl Al-Sayyid
As the signs of victory of the Sudanese armed forces over the rapid support militias and their mercenaries began to appear on the ground, many explosive foreign initiatives began to appear on the horizon, which always appear in times like these and call for an end to the crisis in Sudan, which makes us doubt their integrity and the solutions they propose.
We have already mentioned in previous articles that the countries supporting the war and rebellion have not yet given up on implementing the plan until a military solution is found for these bastards. They constantly change their plans according to changing events. In the military and political arena, they are now turning to alternative plans, including such conferences, summits and rallies.
We respect and appreciate the efforts made by brotherly countries to stop the war which has entered its second year, but what made us look at the situation with apprehension and wonder where these countries were before the war entered his second year, we didn't hear back. these are clear condemnations or denunciations of the United Arab Emirates and the countries that support the militia militarily and in the media in light of its genocides, its rapes of women, its thefts, its systematic destruction of infrastructure and other crimes, to name but a few. but a few.
What is remarkable about this initiative is that it comes at a time when the armed forces are making progress in all military axes and when the indicators of defeat of the militias have become clearly visible, which has pushed some of the countries supporting it to withdraw and to stop supporting her. in shame after the atrocities he committed which were revealed in the international media and the departure of people in many countries against the leaders who support him, which caused some countries to revise their calculations for fear of the roar popular and loss of positions at the same time. when most of the Arab and Islamic countries remained silent out of fear of the countries that sponsored the war and left Sudan alone to fight against these bastards, its armed forces succeeded, thanks to the skill and skill of the military leaders, to stop their advance and prepare. To eliminate them once and for all, despite the difficulty of the battle, which amazed the world and its supporters themselves by the firmness and valor of the armed forces and the Sudanese people in the face of this war whose victory is near. corner.
We are not opposed to any initiative aimed at ending the crisis, but our reservations with regard to such initiatives are that they appear suddenly when the army and the forces supporting it advance on the ground and that, moments, the entire Sudanese people rejoice in these victories and await the definitive announcement to eliminate this militia and its mercenaries. All these reasons combined make us doubt their credibility and who… He moves it under cover to find solutions that suit him and that do not suit us, the people and the government.
After reviewing the statement issued by him, we noticed bombastic paragraphs whose content has multiple meanings. Apparently they are given by us, but after its implementation, signing and agreement, the meanings and words will change to other meanings. which give several meanings and are not clear are a hidden danger, and this is the same role that America played with Sudan in previous agreements was a manipulation of words and words which give several meanings during the negotiations, which change according to the course of events and their development has suffered greatly in previous years.
Returning to the summit declaration, we have some reservations and observations on certain paragraphs numbered 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7.
In paragraphs 2 and 3
We find that it calls for the opening of channels of peaceful dialogue to achieve a comprehensive political settlement based on the principle of national unity, respect for diversity and the aspirations of all Sudanese in a political process that guarantees fair representation and respects all rights.
These paragraphs are considered explosive. When we examine them, we find that they are calling for the return of shameless, or delayed, participation as they like to call it, as the political wing in government.
As for paragraphs 4, 5 and 6, which confirm the commitment of these countries to provide emergency humanitarian assistance, including food, medical supplies and shelter to people affected by the conflict, and to cooperate with humanitarian organizations international organizations to ensure that aid reaches those who need it throughout Sudan.
In addition to allocating a fund to support stability and development in Sudan, which aims to rebuild conflict-affected areas, develop infrastructure and improve employment, education and health opportunities so as to guarantee the building of a stable and sustainable future for the Sudanese people.
In addition to encouraging international institutions to cooperate with Sudan economically and socially and develop a long-term development program, we see that the purpose of this cooperation has become clear, which is a method of temptation after having ensured Qaht's participation in the government. international organizations will be released to support Sudan and its post-war reconstruction.
In addition to allocating a fund to support stability and development in Sudan after applying these conditions, which is also considered a message.
As for paragraph 7
Who calls to emphasize the need to respect the sovereignty of Sudan, to reject external interference which increases the complexity of the crisis, and to call for addressing this crisis within an African, Arab and Islamic framework, taking into account the specificity of Sudan and the needs of its people. .
This means confining and leaving the issue of Sudan within the African, Arab and Islamic framework only to ensure control of the course of affairs in coordination with these countries, so that the issue is resolved away from the UN Security Council and others. international organizations working in this area. human rights, as well as so that Russia and China do not intervene in the Security Council using their veto in favor of the Sudanese question and do not thwart the plan for which millions of dollars have been spent to ensure its success.
In light of these facts, Sudan cannot be isolated, as it is now solving its problems on its own and moving towards a military resolution of the rebellion, which is now on the verge of being resolved and has come a long way. We need all these bomb-laden foreign initiatives and solutions that have been carefully crafted by the intelligence services for the return of foreign agents of Al-Qahta and others as a political body within the government through these provisions, which are rejected by both the government and the government. people.
Finally, we assure all these people that Sudan is capable of solving its problems and solving them on its own, and that it does not need external advice to provide solutions. He is capable of developing them according to his needs and not those of others. .
