The fall of Al -Nahoud: the details did not rub shoulders! Ibrahim shaqlawi – ✍️ the truth
The fall of the city of Al -Nahoud, despite the painful impact he has, should not be read in isolation of the general context of the war of dignity, because the partial event is inseparable from the global existential conflict that the Sudanese State fights against its dismantling project. The Jews represent a turning point in the main confrontation network, and each change in control or catering is subject to more complete estimates. In this article, we try to explore this, given the strategies and tactics of the army in the management of the battle and its reflection on the Global Sudanese scene.
The decline observed by the Sudanese army in Al -Nuhud cannot be described as a “defeat” according to military perspective. Rather, it is a tactical withdrawal calculated in a wider attrition plan, aimed at exhausting the basic force of the rapid support militia and transferring the battle to areas more suitable for aviation and artillery strikes. This movement reflects an advanced military understanding of the art of modern war, because the gains are not measured by geographic control, but by the ability to dismantle and drain hostile power, and to drag it into the basic area of confrontations to get it out of the war equation.
Politically, the attack on Al -Nahoud constitutes an attempt by the militia to create a new reality on the ground which improves its position on the negotiation table and its political agents seek to move regionally, because they activate these days. Consequently, the unified reading of events puts these movements in the field of political maneuvers associated with military operations, because battles are no longer targets for themselves, but rather pressure tools in the engineering of an open conflict between the draft state and the Chaos project.
As for the reaction of the general command of the army, it was characterized by a strategic composure, in recognition that the war of Sudan is a war of will. The fall of a city does not mean loss of war. Rather, it represents a phase of the great battle which is measured by its total fate, and not by fluctuations of circumstantial field. This is in accordance with the famous saying of the German leader “Erfin Rommel”: “War is the failures, the winner is the one who thinks of his second and third movement.”
The rapid militia movement in Al -Nuhud and Al -Khwi is parallel to clear attempts to confuse the progress of the armed forces towards El -Fasher, through what can be described as “attacks distributed to distract attention”. However, the army was treated with sophistication, avoiding direct confrontations and chose to reorganize its lines according to the crucial plans.
He implemented an organized withdrawal from AL -NAHOUD to protect civilians and infrastructure, attracting the militia to fireworks studied, according to two soldiers. The army depends on the Air Force and the “hunter”, which has proven a high combat efficiency. This strategy comes in an approach that has demonstrated its success in the island, Khartoum and other regions, by weakening the capacities of the militia and by hitting its logistics and leadership systems.
As for the moral and political dimension of the scene, it reveals a structural defect in the positions of certain political forces, and a deep ethical and political crisis, manifesting itself in its silence towards the massacres committed by the rapid support militia in Al -Nahoud, which resulted in the death of more than 300 civilians, including children, and denotes for the hospital and the Markets, according to the Sudan doctors. On the other hand, the government underlined through the Minister of Information and its official spokesperson Khaled Al -ir, that Sudan faces the battle of existence, rejecting political extortion under the coverage of military operations, describing certain political forces that it preferred the silence of fear of its interests.
Al -Nuhud, like Sinja, Madani and Khartoum will return, but after contributing to the reformulation of the military spirit which manages the battle, which must learn defeats more than it celebrates the victories. While Marshal Abdel Rahman Swar Al -Dahab said: “The real army learns from his defeats more than his victories.” This lesson is what is concluded in the construction of the main publishing strategy, which does not seem under its feet, but rather looks at the complete cards.
The most important transformation that can be deduced from the battle of Al -Nahoud is the success of the army to force the militia to withdraw its most important formations from Darfur to Kordofan, which means reducing the pressure from El -Fasher, and making room for the recovery of combat priorities, and preventing the militia from concentrating its forces in Darfur.
This, and according to what we see from the face of the truth, the examination of events teaches us that the battle is complete and that victory is not with arms alone, but by national unity and moral and political legitimacy. This war is the battle for existence, no battle. Each temporary decline is a desire for an upcoming victory. Al -Nuhud will soon return with a new conscience and will not forget. Victory is made with persistence, patience and class unit. This battle is a national will, people’s confidence in their army and their leaders. As long as people are united and the army engages in the Liberation plan … These are the details that must be told.
You are fine and well.
Tuesday May 6, 2025 ad shglawi55@gmail.com
