The importance of drawing inspiration from the experience of the Korean model in terms of management in Sudan ✍️ Professor: Fikri Kabbashi, Al-Amin Al-Arabi

South Korea emerged economically and politically collapsed from the Korean Civil War which took place between 1950 and 1953 AD and achieved what is known as the (economic miracle). The rapid progress has attracted the attention of economists and administrators inside and outside South Korea to uncover the motivations and reasons for the success of Korean companies managed according to administrative doctrine and cultural values ​​influenced by Japanese work methods and systems. and the American administrative system.

South Korea and Japan share many cultural characteristics that result from Chinese influence in both countries in the past. Koreans and Japanese view their internal affairs and relations with the outside world from the perspective of Chinese philosophy, particularly Confucianism. Additionally, the Japanese administrative system was applied in Korea during the period of Japanese occupation of the Korean Peninsula, which extended from 1910 until the end of World War II. During this period, the Japanese administration left its mark. on Korean administration, and despite the latter's similarity to the Japanese administrative system, there are differences between the two systems. The most important features of Korean administration will be presented, which are as follows:

1. The dominance of Confucian ethics at work:

The relationship between boss and subordinate, according to Confucian culture, is governed by the principles of justice and ethics, and these principles affect organizational and administrative behavior. It also affects the communication and social relationships of individuals. It is observed that the subordinate shows great loyalty towards the president or the organization. In return, the boss treats the subordinate well and strives to help him.

2. Family values:

In light of the dominance of the principles of Confucian culture, the relationships between family members depend on the role of the father, because he is the only authority in the family. When the father is strong, it leads to creating balance and harmony among family members. Such a relationship applies to Korean organizations. The owner or owner of the organization is considered a father, and the subordinate must obey, respect and trust him, and the owner or boss must meet the requirements of the subordinates.

3. The spirit of individuality:

Collectivism or team spirit is a strong slogan in Korean administration, where emphasis is placed on working within a strong team. Despite this, Korean organizations do not neglect the individual spirit, convinced of its importance in creativity and in its ability to achieve set goals.

4. Personnel management systems:

There are certain characteristics that distinguish personnel management systems in Korean organizations, and these characteristics arise from Korean culture and genes. For example, salary and reward systems are based primarily on seniority. But with the growth of organizations and the advancement of their administrative systems, these organizations have started considering performance while making decisions related to salaries and rewards, and the promotion of workers in operational administration mainly depends seniority. This contrasts with the senior management level, where managers are promoted and rewarded based on their performance.

It is certainly not possible to replicate country experiences in their entirety. The circumstances in which Korea developed and its geographic location make the Korean experience unique and special for the Korean people. However, this does not preclude drawing some lessons and lessons that could be useful to the State of Sudan, which has failed to achieve a comprehensive renaissance despite the availability of enormous natural and financial resources and is in a better position than Korea after the Korean War. War. The most important lessons are summarized as follows:

1. The role of the state: The state has played an important and positive role in the process of economic development. It should be noted that the interventions were based on strong and stable political will and adopted comprehensive long-term strategic planning and sound development policies adapted to the Korean reality. The state also believed that economic development would help it build strength to face the threat from the North and not repeat the experience of Japanese colonialism.

2. Close cooperation between the public and private sectors:

The Korean experience showed that the government was able to reduce coordination problems between itself and the private sector and that it was able, through the relationships that bureaucrats established with big businesses and banks, to obtain the information needed to make investment decisions and direct resources to sectors. which could effectively contribute to economic growth.

3. Scientific research:

Korea has passed many laws to encourage scientific research and established many offices and agencies to coordinate research. The private and public sectors spent enormous financial resources to bridge the gap between Korea and developed countries. further progress, particularly in the areas of information technology and biotechnology, to maintain its position as a technological power.

4. Invest in the human element:

The Korean experience has proven that developing the capabilities of the population through education and training is necessary to create the conditions to keep pace with developments, be competitive and improve productivity, which contributes to decisive way for development.

5. Exploit international circumstances:

Korea found itself caught in the ongoing conflict between the Western and Eastern camps, and thus exploited its alliance with the United States to achieve economic development as part of building its power global and its political, economic, technological and industrial independence.

In conclusion, we can say that the Korean experience, whether in terms of advancement or reconstruction after a devastating war, was a success, but it was not ideal. It is therefore important to pay attention to it. the fact that the growing dependence on giant companies has led to the latter's domination and monopoly over all activities to the detriment of small Korean companies has also led to a major imbalance in development between Seoul and other regions, as well as a great disparity in the benefits of development. opportunities between the poor and the rich classes. This took a heavy toll on the working class in the early years, as they were deprived of almost all their rights. But despite this, the Korean experience remains an example which proves that political will, sound and long-term planning, and good use of resources, and above all, from self-criticism and self-development of local values ​​and culture, can allow the Sudanese people, if they draw inspiration from the Korean experience, to rise and assume a position worthy of their history. Its ancient civilization is expressed in testimonies discovered in many regions, starting in northern Sudan and extending to all regions of the country. .

Teacher: Fikri Kabbashi Al-Amin Al-Arabi

May 15, 2024 AD






Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button