The judiciary is a mirror of an honorable Sudanese past
A fair justice system, we must have been inspired today and we are fighting in order to restore the rule of law and institutions. The colleague of the media Mahfouz Abdeen wrote on the disappearance of witnesses of the month by Al-Devant the Bishindi court complex, where the congregation of the Bishindi judicial complex has noticed the existence of a fund for suggestions and complaints.
And I read Sudan in the 1950s, where justice was measured by values, and love is held responsible if it violates the promise … .. a Sudanese court which requires compensation for psychological damage resulting from the violation of the promise of marriage ..!
The just judicial was a Sudanese judge separating a civil trial belonging to a European expatriate based on the principles of civil law and human rights, and recognized compensation for psychological damage, at a time when such cases have not been accepted even in many Western countries
The complainant Zalaku, a Hungarian, came to Sudan in 1940 as a member of the Hungarian group Acrobat to make offers in Khartoum. After the end of the offers, Zalaku did not come back with his group and decided to stay in Sudan, and worked for a famous film distributor. In October 1945, she met the young man. Azramlian during one of Khartoum’s night evenings, and the relationship between them has become a love story. At the beginning of 1946, the defendant sent a letter to the applicant’s father, expressing his desire to marry him and that he worked as an employee in a company belonging to his father, and he hoped in the near future to become a partner.
But life is not always going as the plan of lovers. In 1947, a. Azramlian about his promise and informed his girlfriend that he could not marry him because of his father’s objection. Three years later, in 1950, he announced his commitment to another woman … Zalaku was not silent. She did not cry in the shade or withdrew from her life in a country which she adopted as a new home. I rather did what was not familiar to many women at the time, and even in our time. A trial was filed before the courts of Khartoum, calling for compensation for psychological damage resulting from a violation of the promise of marriage.
When the court ruled that psychological damage has been proven and decided to compensate the applicant with an amount of 1,188 Sudanese pounds, which is a large quantity at that time, which included costs and costs.
The decision was based on the adaptation of the violation of the promise to marry as a violation of a contractual commitment, which implies contractual responsibility which requires compensation.
This question reflects the level of economic, social, artistic and legal life in Sudan during this advanced period, this story is realistic in its symbolism, which can be told in romantic or legal literature.
