The politicization of international protection ✍️ d. Salah al -Din Muhammad Badawi
* Politicization of international protection: *
– What we mean by politicization here is to explain the role of international considerations and political concepts in the influence of human rights, whether it is linked to the recognition of its existence or to the establishment of devices to supervise its protection and respect.
– This appears in the countries of the states of a different standard to deal with and consider the violations committed by human rights, so that the emphasis is a lot on the violations committed by certain countries and neglecting other more serious violations committed by other countries.
-The beginning of the politicization of international protection of human rights dates back to individual initiatives that emerged during the presidency of (Jimmy Carter) in the United States of America (1977-1981 after JC) and with the collapse of the Union (Soviet) some of its countries adopted Western principles, then the Western European countries have linked their countries, Soviet Politicization emerged in the post-war period the second world, with the presence of two wrestling giants (the United States of America-the Soviet Union) which exchanged accusations between them on human rights and violation, while closing their eyes on what allied governments do, and exposed what is done in the corresponding camps, for example, the United States improved a blockage on Cuba. To change its policy and improve its assessment of human rights, but on the one hand, it supports totalitarian and military regimes in Central and South America, which has been more fierce in human rights, and for its part, the Soviet Union has practiced the media failure to violate human rights in socialist countries, which later influenced third -party world countries.
– Linking to Protect Human Rights to the Interests of the Controlled Countries – At the Global Level (Economically, Military and Politically) Led to Selectivity and Double Standards in Dealing with the PracticeD Towads the Rights of States and the Freedoms of Individuals, and What Is Unfortune Collective Action Action Represents by the United Nations and its Executive Apparus (Security Council) that country that are military, Economically and Technological, Are the Same As the Influenial in this Institution, and He reveals that politicization is that politicization is that politicization can absorb legitimate clothing, which leads to selective work of nations United and this is due to the United Nations Action Mechanism, in particular in the issue of decisions set an end to the violations committed against countries and individuals and their freedoms, cannot be obtained with a world in the world, it is the only pioneering interest in working at the international level, so that each country must renounce the quantity of simple rights of this selfishness, even to prove the good will in its request for human rights, Human rights are no more than what is a candle or a bridge to achieve objectives that are not associated with the quantity of services.
– Therefore, the ISSUE OF INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION REMAINS A SOURCE OF MANY THEORIES AND JURISPRUDENTIAL OPINESS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND ALSO REMAINS A MATTER OF POLITICAL AND Moral Controversy and A Point Of DISAGRABLE BETWEEN STATES, SOME OF WHIC MAY Relates to Transgression by A State or Group of Counties Outside its Geographical Borders, and its entry into the Compertcies of Other Countries, and sometimes it may constitutes merely a declaration of a state or international body of a decision -related human rights decision, the orientation of another country which can reject it armed with national sovereignty, knowing that the violation of the sovereignty of states has never been the result of the activation of the protection rules International, but rather a direct result of the existence of imbalances in the international system, with the presence of a country with an influence and a power that only care about its interests.
– International Protection for Human Rights is a Number of Measures Taken by International Bodies, which Take from these Rights a Subject of Their Activities, or as these Rights One of the Fields that these bodies are interested in, and there is is not from International Protection Organized in Something, Thresters, Thresters or Pressures Practices (Criminal) Carried Out by Countries Towards the other, as the Reason for Protecting Human Rights, as the Rules of Proper International Interaction requires that every country that sees the behavior of another country refers to a violation of human rights to international organizations specializing in this violation and International agreements linked to international climates, which are controlled by interests above all due to contradictions, opposition and complex and tense relations, which led to the loss of confidence in the presence of effective international human rights at the international level … He follows … he follows … he follows … he follows … he follows …
Dr Salah al -Din Muhammad Badawi
S.mohamed.sm788@gmail.com
Follow us
