The proof: American victories and sanctions – scenes and evidence – ✍️ Absher Shajarabi
1/1
analysis
*Views and evidence*
📝 *Absher Shajarabi* *(email protected)*
The United States intends to impose sanctions on the commander of the Sudanese army, Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan. According to the sources who spoke this weekend, these sanctions come against the backdrop of accusations against the Sudanese armed forces of having committed violations, including targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure, as well as preventing the arrival of humanitarian aid.
* One of the sources, a well-informed diplomat, confirmed that the refusal of the Sudanese army to participate in peace talks over the past year was one of the main reasons that pushed Washington to take this decision . In this context, the analytical reading reviews the dimensions of this US decision, its timing and motivations, in addition to the potential effects on the path to a military and political resolution in Sudan, and the steps that the Sudanese government must take to cope. these challenges.
* Pressure on the Sudanese army: The decision indicates a US attempt to influence the dynamics of the conflict in Sudan, and perhaps hinder the path to a resolution which appears to be moving in favor of the army and the government.
* A signal of support for other powers, as sanctions may reflect U.S. bias toward parties or groups hostile to the military, particularly in light of mutual accusations of violations and responsibility in the humanitarian crisis. US motivations for imposing sanctions can be analyzed through the following elements: humanitarian pressures and the use of… The issue of human rights violations and targeting of civilians is a major tool to justify sanctions, particularly with reports of famine, food shortages and denial of humanitarian access. It appears that Washington's diplomacy is seeking to bring Sudan back to the negotiating table in small ways, through sanctions, after the army and government refused to undermine its sovereignty by participating in the unfair and impartial talks from Geneva. The regional balance leads the United States to view Sudanese military advances as a threat to broader regional stability, particularly in light of Sudan's influence over neighboring countries like Libya, Ethiopia and Chad .
*And we continue
Follow us
