The speech of Dr. Kamel Idris … The balance of reasons and the responsibility of the scene – whispering of letters – ✍️ d. Al -Baqir Abdul Qayyum Ali

The Prime Minister’s speech, His Excellency, Dr. Kamel Idris, came as a dose of political balance and intellectual sobriety at a time when Sudan crosses a very sensitive tour, because internal challenges intersect with external pressures, visions vary and entry into force, and despite all this complexity, Dr Idris appeared on the Sudan country capable of the production of leaders The state, not the language of slogans.
In the introduction of his speech, Dr. Idris did not neglect the greeting of the Sudanese armed forces, all the regular forces and supported them, and for all those who were held with his money, and with his pen, by keeping the role of the media at this articulated stage, and he clearly expressed his appreciation for the national institutions which protect sovereignty, then he does not later revive The control in the Replace What stability is based on the shoulders of an army professional and unified, and on security devices that integrate their roles without conflict or division.
And Dr. Kamel Idris also sent confident and direct messages to the international community, examining a new image of Sudan, not as a state oscillating between transformations, but rather as a country which has become its path and has found its compass towards civilization, without decrease or guardianship. His words did not begged or did not justify, but rather a calm declaration that Sudan shook his shoulders, and here is the head of the head, a state of sovereignty and institutions, and thanked the countries of the region which did well, and stood by Sudan in his ordeal, realizing that the construction is only with the solidarity of the neighbors.
The discourse was not just protocol words, but a carrier between its lines is multi -directional messages, and clear indications, which include booth interior and outside, in the interior, idris stressed that he will be at the same distance from all parts and entities, in reference to his commitment to the institutional neutrality, Added in a clear political sophistication, that he will be closed to the people, and it is an expression that reduced his moral position from power, that there is no authority over the will of the citizen and no legitimacy exceeds national interest.
On the other hand, Idris sent an indirect message to those who thought that the conversation in a foreign language is a synonym of understanding and progress, and in a silent but intelligent response, Idris has moved between several languages, not an examination of his capacities, but to send a sign that efficiency is not measured in an expression, but deeply the idea, the maturity of the vision and the inclusion of the program.
Here, it was necessary to compare, imposed by reality, not intention, between Dr Idris and his predecessor, Dr Abdullah Hamdouk. While Hamdouk’s speech was described as an excessive calm, which was close to ambiguity, Idris’ speech was characterized by clarity and determination, without falling into the trap of polarization or excitement. While Hamdouk was known for the absence of a clear vision in state administration, Idris came to announce her possession of ready programs and an applicable vision, based on her vast international experience, and her in -depth knowledge of defects and means of reform.
It is only hidden from anyone that Sudan has an urgent need for a leader who combines vision and belonging, and between national discourse and realistic approach, Dr. Kamel Idris, with his university personality, his wide experience, his balanced language and his multidimensional discourse, seems qualified to play this role in an exceptional national moment.
The assurance that its dissemination of speeches is not only in words, but in the way it was presented, and in the symbolic messages which were carefully launched, from the greeting to its prayer, and of its succession, then he began to salute the offender before his supporters, to the object of those who bet outside more than the interior of the Wounds showing that different from the history of history.
Perhaps this discourse, with the balance and the realist he was carrying, will be the beginning of the reconstruction of confidence between the citizen and the state, and perhaps that he wanted to send an indirect message to everyone in his heart, an atomic awareness that Sudan, despite everything, is always able to note, if the will, the vision and the conscious direction are found.
And God is at the origin of intention, and He guides the same way



