What is under the sieve? – from the top of the platform – ✍️ Yasser al -fadni
In His Last Speech, General Abdel -Fattah Al -Burhan Addressed the Issue of the National Congress With Terms that Carried a Mixture of Political Clarity and Strategic Conflict, A Talk that requirements an in -Depth understanding and accurate induction of the Current Stage and the Positions We must go beyond emotional reactions to reflection on the major fate of the country. His speech was neither exclusive nor emotional, but rather brought a specific message that Sudan today needed a different step, based on the lessons of the past without falling into his mistakes.
The good understanding of this conversation requires awareness that Sudan is a state that changes according to the requirements of reality, and not according to the desires of individuals or currents, and that the question of the management of the National Conference or D ‘Other political forces cannot be subject to the logic of political qualifications or intellectual revolutions, but should rather be subject to the logic of the State, where national interest is the compass which directs decisions, and not desire to satisfy one party or to punish another. The proof was aware of the sensitivity of this point, then he chose his words carefully, stressing that Sudan could not return, but at the same time, it will not be a hostage to the policies of exclusion and revenge that produce than more crises.
The lesson of this conversation is that policy is not an arena to liquidate accounts, but rather the art of managing different diversity and interests for stability for the State and the Company. The national congress has been part of the Sudanese political scene for decades, and it has supporters and adversaries, but it cannot be the logic of absolute eradication, and its reproduction in the same previous image is not An option. What is necessary today is not to restore the experiences of the past, but to absorb it and understand the reasons for its trip, and to work to build a new model that takes into account previous errors without Repeat them.
The approach in the Hadiths of Al -Burhan is obvious in its conscience that Sudan does not need secondary battles which consume its capacity and dissipate its efforts, but rather a political vision which can cross it towards stability. Absolute exclusion creates crises which are no less dangerous than absolute monopoly, which both lead to the same result: blocking the political horizon. The message that can be read between the lines is that Sudan must have all its children, according to new rules based on national consensus, and not on ideological diktats or close calculations.
The prolonged analysis of this conversation leads to a fundamental conclusion, namely that Sudan is going through a detailed moment which requires a precise balance between the recognition of the past without consuming it and starting to the future without it being jumped into the void. The proof did not speak from a personal point of view, but rather as a state who sees the whole scene, and realizes that politics does not tolerate emotional decisions, but rather needs decisions weighing interest national before something else. In the end, what determines the future of Sudan is not slogans, but rather the capacity to build common ground which guarantees its stability and cohesion in the face of internal and external challenges.
In light of this complex scene, if the national congress, if he wants to be part of the future of Sudan, is not only a page of his past, he must face the reality of rationality and awareness of the changes that have occurred in the country. Sudan is no longer the same years ago and political equations no longer tolerate the reproduction of previous experiences without serious critical examination. Wisdom requires that the National Congress realizes that the return to the stage is not with a challenge and a confrontation, but rather by examination and development, and that Sudan needs today a new balanced and realistic political discourse , putting the country on partisan accounts and providing real solutions to crises instead of concluding illegal conflicts.
Any attempt to return with the same tools and the same previous methodologies will only do more polarization and division, and therefore the wise option is a deep renewal, not only in discourse but in the same political practice. The National Congress must realize that its responsibility today is not only the defense of its inheritance, but the active contribution to the construction of the future of Sudan on new foundations of political openness, rational dealing with various powers And avoiding the methods of confrontation which brought to Sudan only more crises.
What is necessary is a new approach, based on the recognition of past errors and the preparation of a positive interaction with the current reality, far from the logic of political stubbornness or the desire to restore influence by strength. The country is at a stage which requires political maturity, and in preparation for integration into a complete national project, and not that each party only concerns its partisan interests. If the National Congress does not realize this fact, it will find itself isolated from the scene, incapable of influencing it, while if it deals with variables with consciousness and reason, it could have a positive role in the reformulation of the ‘Future of Sudan in a way that serves its stability and rebirth.
