Who tries to recycle failure?! An open letter to the Prime Minister – Al -Dai Large – ✍️ d. Mohamed Tabidi
When the Sudanese people pushed the most expensive lives and blood in order to recover their dignity and build their state, they not only dreamed of dropping a regime, but impatiently awaited a fundamental change in the approach of government, choice paths and decision -making centers.
However, today, we are in front of a scene that raises anxiety and raises unparalleled major questions:
Anyone who is behind an attempt to plant certain symbols of the Forces of Liberty and Change (QAT) that have been associated with the experience of the former Prime Minister, Dr. Abdullah Hamdouk, in the body of the new government? And who insists on recycling the advisers who failed yesterday, as if the country had not crossed the turning point, and barely out of the tunnel of chaos and narrow partisan tears?
We write from the point of view of care, and not of rivalry … and in the event of sincere criticism, not political rivalry. The national duty obliges us to warn of this early deviation on the path, which can bring us back to the cycle of quotas and political obstacles, and interrupt the dreams of people in a government according to efficiency, and not of loyalty and responsibility, not dependence.
We are not in a state of political luxury which allows us to experiment with experience, nor in a temporal space which allows us to go through intellectual adventures or to reproduce the errors of the past. The reality is difficult, people are exhausted and confidence in the leaders erodes whenever the faces of the yesterday approach the centers of influence.
If some try to whiten these faces or pass them under false slogans, let him know that popular memory is not pious, and that consciousness can grow after each mother tears up, each soldier and each breath of a besieged homeland.
Mr. Prime Minister,
We are not against dialogue or openness, but we are against the organizer of state institutions and against the recycling of failure under the name of “national consensus”. The real consensus begins with respect for the will of the street, not to shake hands with the trembling hands which caused the ruin of the first civil experience.
Imam Al -Shafi’i said: “The sensible person who preached to others, and ignoring him of those who preach.” We hope you are among those who welcome stage lessons and read the messages deeply and calmly, not under pressure from power centers or on the impact of gray sounds.
Today, we criticize, so that we do not regret tomorrow. We write loudly, so that it was not said: “Where were you when you created the old faces of the scene again?”
Neither for the savings of ashes, nor for all those who infiltrate through the rear windows to impose themselves on the will of the people in the name of the revolution and he is a traitor to his blood.
I will write to the homeland until my last breath
